These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29705994)

  • 1. Weak interspecific interactions in a sagebrush steppe? Conflicting evidence from observations and experiments.
    Adler PB; Kleinhesselink A; Hooker G; Taylor JB; Teller B; Ellner SP
    Ecology; 2018 Jul; 99(7):1621-1632. PubMed ID: 29705994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Climate influences the demography of three dominant sagebrush steppe plants.
    Dalgleish HJ; Koons DN; Hooten MB; Moffet CA; Adler PB
    Ecology; 2011 Jan; 92(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 21560678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grass-Shrub Associations over a Precipitation Gradient and Their Implications for Restoration in the Great Basin, USA.
    Holthuijzen MF; Veblen KE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143170. PubMed ID: 26625156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coexistence of perennial plants: an embarrassment of niches.
    Adler PB; Ellner SP; Levine JM
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Aug; 13(8):1019-29. PubMed ID: 20545729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Loss of foundation species increases population growth of exotic forbs in sagebrush steppe.
    Prevéy JS; Germino MJ; Huntly NJ
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1890-902. PubMed ID: 21049877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition.
    Adler PB; Smull D; Beard KH; Choi RT; Furniss T; Kulmatiski A; Meiners JM; Tredennick AT; Veblen KE
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Sep; 21(9):1319-1329. PubMed ID: 29938882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A warmer and drier climate in the northern sagebrush biome does not promote cheatgrass invasion or change its response to fire.
    Larson CD; Lehnhoff EA; Rew LJ
    Oecologia; 2017 Dec; 185(4):763-774. PubMed ID: 29038863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weak effect of climate variability on coexistence in a sagebrush steppe community.
    Adler PB; HilleRisLambers J; Levine JM
    Ecology; 2009 Dec; 90(12):3303-12. PubMed ID: 20120800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of competition on stable carbon isotope ratios of two tussock grass species.
    Williams K; Richards JH; Caldwell MM
    Oecologia; 1991 Sep; 88(1):148-151. PubMed ID: 28312744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restoration of mountain big sagebrush steppe following prescribed burning to control western juniper.
    Davies KW; Bates JD; Madsen MD; Nafus AM
    Environ Manage; 2014 May; 53(5):1015-22. PubMed ID: 24573166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do plant-soil feedbacks promote coexistence in a sagebrush steppe?
    Chung YA; Monaco TA; Taylor JB; Adler PB
    Ecology; 2023 Jul; 104(7):e4056. PubMed ID: 37078529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A framework for linking competitor ecological differences to coexistence.
    Ousterhout BH; Serrano M; Bried JT; Siepielski AM
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Oct; 88(10):1534-1548. PubMed ID: 31222738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Annual grass invasion in sagebrush steppe: the relative importance of climate, soil properties and biotic interactions.
    Bansal S; Sheley RL
    Oecologia; 2016 Jun; 181(2):543-57. PubMed ID: 26920900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trajectories of change in sagebrush steppe vegetation communities in relation to multiple wildfires.
    Davies GM; Bakker JD; Dettweiler-Robinson E; Dunwiddie PW; Hall SA; Downs J; Evans J
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Jul; 22(5):1562-77. PubMed ID: 22908714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An expanded modern coexistence theory for empirical applications.
    Ellner SP; Snyder RE; Adler PB; Hooker G
    Ecol Lett; 2019 Jan; 22(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 30311392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interspecific facilitation mediates the outcome of intraspecific interactions across an elevational gradient.
    Raath-Krüger MJ; Schöb C; McGeoch MA; le Roux PC
    Ecology; 2021 Jan; 102(1):e03200. PubMed ID: 32970842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetric competition between plant species.
    Connolly J; Wayne P
    Oecologia; 1996 Oct; 108(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 28307844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative importance of abiotic, biotic, and disturbance drivers of plant community structure in the sagebrush steppe.
    Mitchell RM; Bakker JD; Vincent JB; Davies GM
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):756-768. PubMed ID: 27935663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seedling defoliation may enhance survival of dominant wheatgrasses but not
    Denton EM; Pyle LA; Sheley RL
    AoB Plants; 2021 Aug; 13(4):plab047. PubMed ID: 34457229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The response of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) to interannual climate variation changes across its range.
    Kleinhesselink AR; Adler PB
    Ecology; 2018 May; 99(5):1139-1149. PubMed ID: 29624667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.