These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29706191)
1. Multi-criteria optimization achieves superior normal tissue sparing in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients. Xiao J; Li Y; Shi H; Chang T; Luo Y; Wang X; He Y; Chen N Oral Oncol; 2018 May; 80():74-81. PubMed ID: 29706191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-criteria optimization achieves superior normal tissue sparing in a planning study of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for RTOG 1308-eligible non-small cell lung cancer patients. Kamran SC; Mueller BS; Paetzold P; Dunlap J; Niemierko A; Bortfeld T; Willers H; Craft D Radiother Oncol; 2016 Mar; 118(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 26830694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Split-field vs extended-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans for oropharyngeal cancer: Which spares the larynx? Which spares the thyroid? Yu Y; Chen J; Leary CI; Shugard E; Yom SS Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26947055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is uniform target dose possible in IMRT plans in the head and neck? Vineberg KA; Eisbruch A; Coselmon MM; McShan DL; Kessler ML; Fraass BA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Apr; 52(5):1159-72. PubMed ID: 11955726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of multi-criteria optimization (MCO) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT). Zieminski S; Khandekar M; Wang Y J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 29411526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord. Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric advantages of intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer compared with intensity-modulated radiation: A case-matched control analysis. Holliday EB; Kocak-Uzel E; Feng L; Thaker NG; Blanchard P; Rosenthal DI; Gunn GB; Garden AS; Frank SJ Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 27158021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicriteria optimization enables less experienced planners to efficiently produce high quality treatment plans in head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Kierkels RG; Visser R; Bijl HP; Langendijk JA; van 't Veld AA; Steenbakkers RJ; Korevaar EW Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():87. PubMed ID: 25885444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A; Ghosh-Laskar S; Agarwal JP; Upreti RR; Budrukkar A; Murthy V; Deshpande DD; Shrivastava SK; Dinshaw KA; Cozzi L Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19157609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of larynx-sparing techniques with IMRT when treating the head and neck. Webster GJ; Rowbottom CG; Ho KF; Slevin NJ; Mackay RI Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):617-22. PubMed ID: 18793966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving target dose coverage and organ-at-risk sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of advanced laryngeal cancer by a simple optimization technique. Lu JY; Wu LL; Zhang JY; Zheng J; Cheung ML; Ma CC; Xie LX; Huang BT Br J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 88(1046):20140654. PubMed ID: 25494885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semiautomated head-and-neck IMRT planning using dose warping and scaling to robustly adapt plans in a knowledge database containing potentially suboptimal plans. Schmidt M; Lo JY; Grzetic S; Lutzky C; Brizel DM; Das SK Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4428-34. PubMed ID: 26233173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparisons of IMRT planning using MCO and DMPO techniques. Liao X; Lang J; Li N; Wang P; Li J; Yang J; Chen Y Technol Health Care; 2017 Jul; 25(S1):107-114. PubMed ID: 28582898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality. Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]