239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29706214)
1. Evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Correlation between hard tissue and soft tissue landmarks.
Economou S; Stoustrup P; Kristensen KD; Dalstra M; Küseler A; Herlin T; Pedersen TK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):662-672.e1. PubMed ID: 29706214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis of facial asymmetry based on three-dimensional photography: a valuable indicator for asymmetrical temporomandibular joint affection in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients?
Bernini JM; Kellenberger CJ; Eichenberger M; Eliades T; Papageorgiou SN; Patcas R
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J; 2020 Jan; 18(1):10. PubMed ID: 32005249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis.
Lee JK; Jung PK; Moon CH
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 23758600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of facial soft tissue thickness in symmetric and asymmetric subjects with the use of cone-beam computed tomography.
Siqueira de Lima L; Brunetto DP; da Cunha Gonçalves Nojima M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Feb; 155(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 30712693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facial morphology in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and moderate to severe temporomandibular joint involvement.
Hsieh YJ; Darvann TA; Hermann NV; Larsen P; Liao YF; Bjoern-Joergensen J; Kreiborg S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 26827974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.
Park JU; Kook YA; Kim Y
Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):860-7. PubMed ID: 22356706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No association between types of unilateral mandibular condylar abnormalities and facial asymmetry in orthopedic-treated patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Stoustrup PB; Ahlefeldt-Laurvig-Lehn N; Kristensen KD; Arvidsson LZ; Twilt M; Cattaneo PM; Küseler A; Christensen AE; Herlin T; Pedersen TK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Feb; 153(2):214-223. PubMed ID: 29407498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis.
Porto OC; de Freitas JC; de Alencar AH; Estrela C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):78-85. PubMed ID: 25628083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry.
Shin SM; Kim YM; Kim NR; Choi YS; Park SB; Kim YI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 27476357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Divergence between CBCT and Optical Scans for Soft Tissue Analysis and Cephalometry in Facial Imaging: A cross-sectional study on healthy adults.
Farronato M; Cenzato N; Crispino R; Tartaglia FC; Biagi R; Baldini B; Maspero C
Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100845. PubMed ID: 38350255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Three-dimensional Analysis of Zygomatic Symmetry in Normal, Uninjured Faces.
Belcastro A; Willing R; Jenkyn T; Johnson M; Galil K; Yazdani A
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 26967083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facial surface morphology predicts variation in internal skeletal shape.
Young NM; Sherathiya K; Gutierrez L; Nguyen E; Bekmezian S; Huang JC; Hallgrímsson B; Lee JS; Marcucio RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 27021454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness?
Lee ST; Mori Y; Minami K; An CH; Park JW; Kwon TG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(9):1577-87. PubMed ID: 23800674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Craniofacial features affecting mandibular asymmetries in skeletal Class II patients.
Thiesen G; Gribel BF; Freitas MPM; Oliver DR; Kim KB
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):437-445. PubMed ID: 28667433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography.
Dobai A; Markella Z; Vízkelety T; Fouquet C; Rosta A; Barabás J
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Nov; 79(6):371-379. PubMed ID: 30255320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison.
Berssenbrügge P; Berlin NF; Kebeck G; Runte C; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e327-34. PubMed ID: 24507934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography.
Minich CM; Araújo EA; Behrents RG; Buschang PH; Tanaka OM; Kim KB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23810046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
