BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29706223)

  • 1. Three-dimensional mandibular regional superimposition in growing patients.
    Nguyen T; Cevidanes L; Franchi L; Ruellas A; Jackson T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):747-754. PubMed ID: 29706223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid 3D mandibular superimposition for growing patients.
    Koerich L; Weissheimer A; de Menezes LM; Lindauer SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2017 May; 87(3):473-479. PubMed ID: 27767348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D Mandibular Superimposition: Comparison of Regions of Reference for Voxel-Based Registration.
    Ruellas AC; Yatabe MS; Souki BQ; Benavides E; Nguyen T; Luiz RR; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157625. PubMed ID: 27336366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of voxel- and surface-based cone-beam computed tomography mandibular superimposition in adult orthodontic patients.
    Han G; Li J; Wang S; Wang L; Zhou Y; Liu Y
    J Int Med Res; 2021 Jan; 49(1):300060520982708. PubMed ID: 33459090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study.
    Koerich L; Burns D; Weissheimer A; Claus JD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 26794399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
    Lemieux G; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C; Secanell M; Hart A; Lagravère MO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The three-dimensional stable mandibular landmarks in patients between the ages of 12.5 and 17.1 years.
    Chen G; Al Awadi M; Chambers DW; Lagravère-Vich MO; Xu T; Oh H
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 May; 20(1):153. PubMed ID: 32460733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
    Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients.
    Cevidanes LH; Heymann G; Cornelis MA; DeClerck HJ; Tulloch JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 19577154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and reproducibility of CBCT assessment of mandibular changes before and after treatment for Class III growing patients - an easy and quick way for evaluation.
    Hu X; Cheung GSP; Zhang Y; Sun R; Dong F
    BMC Pediatr; 2023 Nov; 23(1):602. PubMed ID: 38017394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volumetric analysis of chin and mandibular retromolar region as donor sites for cortico-cancellous bone blocks.
    Zeltner M; Flückiger LB; Hämmerle CH; Hüsler J; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):999-1004. PubMed ID: 26748953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ruellas AC; Huanca Ghislanzoni LT; Gomes MR; Danesi C; Lione R; Nguyen T; McNamara JA; Cozza P; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 27021458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant-based three-dimensional superimposition of the growing mandible in a rabbit model.
    Parton AL; Duncan WJ; Oliveira ME; Key O; Farella M
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):546-52. PubMed ID: 26609073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular growth and tooth eruption.
    Krarup S; Darvann TA; Larsen P; Marsh JL; Kreiborg S
    J Anat; 2005 Nov; 207(5):669-82. PubMed ID: 16313399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision and reliability of Dolphin 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition.
    Bazina M; Cevidanes L; Ruellas A; Valiathan M; Quereshy F; Syed A; Wu R; Palomo JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 29602352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Mandibular Lingual Canal and Anterior Loop Length to Minimize Complications Associated With Anterior Mandibular Surgeries: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Kung CY; Wang YM; Chan CP; Ju YR; Pan WL
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 75(10):2116.e1-2116.e13. PubMed ID: 28704637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillofacial anatomy: the mandibular symphysis.
    Miller RJ; Edwards WC; Boudet C; Cohen JH
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):745-53. PubMed ID: 20932161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Minich CM; Araújo EA; Behrents RG; Buschang PH; Tanaka OM; Kim KB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23810046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.