These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29706282)

  • 21. Pharmacy students' views of faculty feedback on academic performance.
    Hall M; Hanna LA; Quinn S
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2012 Feb; 76(1):5. PubMed ID: 22412204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design and evaluation of a two-phase learner-centered new student orientation program.
    Zeeman JM; Wingo BL; Cox WC
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Apr; 10(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 29793711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
    Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploring Electronic Communication Modes Between Iraqi Faculty and Students of Pharmacy Schools Using the Technology Acceptance Model.
    Al-Jumaili AA; Al-Rekabi MD; Alsawad OS; Allela OQB; Carnahan R; Saaed H; Naqishbandi A; Kadhim DJ; Sorofman B
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2017 Jun; 81(5):89. PubMed ID: 28720917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing perceptions of student abilities in diabetes self-management education and support among students, faculty and patients.
    Augustine J; Thurston MM; Gates AW; Manigault KR
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2021 Apr; 13(4):409-416. PubMed ID: 33715804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retention of Students' Ability to Incorporate a Computer into Simulated Patient Encounters.
    Ray S; Bellone J; Zupec N; Bartelme K
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Dec; 82(10):6748. PubMed ID: 30643312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing student self-assessments of global communication with trained faculty and standardized patient assessments.
    Pawluk SA; Zolezzi M; Rainkie D
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Jun; 10(6):779-784. PubMed ID: 30025780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of students' perceptions of the Socrative application versus a traditional student response system and its impact on classroom engagement.
    Guarascio AJ; Nemecek BD; Zimmerman DE
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Sep; 9(5):808-812. PubMed ID: 29233308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Utilization of a virtual patient for advanced assessment of student performance in pain management.
    Smith MA; Waite LH
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Sep; 9(5):893-897. PubMed ID: 29233321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a Modified Debate Exercise Adapted to the Pedagogy of Team-Based Learning.
    Viswesh V; Yang H; Gupta V
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 May; 82(4):6278. PubMed ID: 29867240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. e-Assessment in a Limited-Resources Dental School Using an Open-Source Learning Management System.
    El Tantawi MM; Abdelsalam MM; Mourady AM; Elrifae IM
    J Dent Educ; 2015 May; 79(5):571-83. PubMed ID: 25941151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Student accuracy and evaluation of a computer-based audience response system.
    Holmes RG; Blalock JS; Parker MH; Haywood VB
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Dec; 70(12):1355-61. PubMed ID: 17170327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy of formative evaluation using a focus group for a large classroom setting in an accelerated pharmacy program.
    Nolette S; Nguyen A; Kogan D; Oswald C; Whittaker A; Chakraborty A
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Jul; 9(4):633-638. PubMed ID: 29233436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of electronic versus paper rubrics to assess patient counseling experiences in a skills-based lab course.
    Haack S; Fornoff A; Caligiuri F; Dy-Boarman E; Bottenberg M; Mobley-Bukstein W; Bryant G; Bryant A
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Nov; 9(6):1117-1122. PubMed ID: 29233380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of a Teaching Assistant Program for Third-Year Pharmacy Students.
    Bradley CL; Khanova J; Scolaro KL
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2016 Nov; 80(9):149. PubMed ID: 28090098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implementation and faculty assessment of an oral examination in a therapeutics course in a distance synchronous education pharmacy programme.
    Benavides S; Borja-Hart NL; Maniscalco-Feichtl M
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2011 Dec; 19(6):438-43. PubMed ID: 22060241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of an Analytical Grading Rubric for Self-Assessment: A Pilot Study for a Periodontal Oral Competency Examination in Predoctoral Dental Education.
    Satheesh KM; Brockmann LB; Liu Y; Gadbury-Amyot CC
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1429-36. PubMed ID: 26632297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment.
    Boevé AJ; Meijer RR; Albers CJ; Beetsma Y; Bosker RJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143616. PubMed ID: 26641632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of the Muddiest Point Technique as an exam review in an integrated pharmacotherapy course.
    Bullock KC; Gibson C; Howard M; Liu J; Tatachar A; Yuet WC
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Sep; 10(9):1295-1302. PubMed ID: 30497634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Equivalency of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing.
    DeAngelis S
    J Allied Health; 2000; 29(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 11026118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.