These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29706907)

  • 1. Attentional Bias in Human Category Learning: The Case of Deep Learning.
    Hanson C; Caglar LR; Hanson SJ
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():374. PubMed ID: 29706907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. REFRESH: A new approach to modeling dimensional biases in perceptual similarity and categorization.
    Sanborn AN; Heller K; Austerweil JL; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Nov; 128(6):1145-1186. PubMed ID: 34516151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unsupervised category learning with integral-dimension stimuli.
    Ell SW; Ashby FG; Hutchinson S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1537-62. PubMed ID: 22506861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing methods of category learning: Classification versus feature inference.
    Morgan EL; Johansen MK
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):710-730. PubMed ID: 32078736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel representations that support rule-based categorization are acquired on-the-fly during category learning.
    Soto FA; Ashby FG
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):544-566. PubMed ID: 30806809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Category-Biased Neural Representations Form Spontaneously during Learning That Emphasizes Memory for Specific Instances.
    Ashby SR; Zeithamova D
    J Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 42(5):865-876. PubMed ID: 34937702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accessing similarity and dimensional relations: effects of integrality and separability on the discovery of complex concepts.
    Kemler DG; Smith LB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Jun; 108(2):133-50. PubMed ID: 528902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Category learning in older adulthood: A study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.
    Rabi R; Minda JP
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Mar; 31(2):185-197. PubMed ID: 26765750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.
    Nosofsky RM; Kruschke JK; McKinley SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):211-33. PubMed ID: 1532819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expanding the search for a linear separability constraint on category learning.
    Blair M; Homa D
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Dec; 29(8):1153-64. PubMed ID: 11913752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Neural Dynamics of Attentional Selection in Natural Scenes.
    Kaiser D; Oosterhof NN; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 36(41):10522-10528. PubMed ID: 27733605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finding categories through words: More nameable features improve category learning.
    Zettersten M; Lupyan G
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104135. PubMed ID: 31821963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Where do features come from?
    Hinton G
    Cogn Sci; 2014 Aug; 38(6):1078-101. PubMed ID: 23800216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature saliency and feedback information interactively impact visual category learning.
    Hammer R; Sloutsky V; Grill-Spector K
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():74. PubMed ID: 25745404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associative learning in baboons (Papio papio) and humans (Homo sapiens): species differences in learned attention to visual features.
    Fagot J; Kruschke JK; Dépy D; Vauclair J
    Anim Cogn; 1998 Oct; 1(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 24399276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of category learning on attentional modulation of visual cortex.
    Folstein JR; Fuller K; Howard D; DePatie T
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Sep; 104():18-30. PubMed ID: 28754490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating (and Improving) the Correspondence Between Deep Neural Networks and Human Representations.
    Peterson JC; Abbott JT; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):2648-2669. PubMed ID: 30178468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive learning in a compartmental model of visual cortex-how feedback enables stable category learning and refinement.
    Layher G; Schrodt F; Butz MV; Neumann H
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1287. PubMed ID: 25538637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments.
    Spalding TL; Murphy GL
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Sep; 27(5):856-67. PubMed ID: 10540814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.