142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29707326)
1. Spontaneous regionalization of esophageal cancer surgery: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Arnold BN; Chiu AS; Hoag JR; Kim CH; Salazar MC; Blasberg JD; Boffa DJ
J Thorac Dis; 2018 Mar; 10(3):1721-1731. PubMed ID: 29707326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of hospital volume on long-term survival after esophageal cancer surgery.
Rouvelas I; Lindblad M; Zeng W; Viklund P; Ye W; Lagergren J
Arch Surg; 2007 Feb; 142(2):113-7; discussion 118. PubMed ID: 17309961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical volume and quality of care for esophageal resection: do high-volume hospitals have fewer complications?
Dimick JB; Pronovost PJ; Cowan JA; Lipsett PA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2003 Feb; 75(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 12607635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regionalization of thoracic surgery improves short-term cancer esophagectomy outcomes.
Ely S; Alabaster A; Ashiku SK; Patel A; Velotta JB
J Thorac Dis; 2019 May; 11(5):1867-1878. PubMed ID: 31285879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization.
Urbach DR; Bell CM; Austin PC
CMAJ; 2003 May; 168(11):1409-14. PubMed ID: 12771069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths.
Dudley RA; Johansen KL; Brand R; Rennie DJ; Milstein A
JAMA; 2000 Mar; 283(9):1159-66. PubMed ID: 10703778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of robotic esophagectomies for esophageal cancer by hospital volume: an analysis of the national cancer database.
Hue JJ; Bachman KC; Worrell SG; Gray KE; Linden PA; Towe CW
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3802-3810. PubMed ID: 32789587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities.
Schlottmann F; Strassle PD; Charles AG; Patti MG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 29349529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Thoracic Surgery Regionalization on 1- and 3-Year Survival after Cancer Esophagectomy.
Ely S; Alabaster A; Dominguez DA; Maxim C; Ashiku SK; Patel AR; Velotta JB
Ann Surg; 2023 Feb; 277(2):e305-e312. PubMed ID: 34261883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National Trends in Treatment for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Modern Appraisal of Variability in Therapeutic Strategies.
Villano AM; Vidri RJ; Vo ET; Greco SH; Howell KJ; von Mehren M; Farma JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 29(4):2275-2285. PubMed ID: 34635978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospital characteristics associated with better 'quality of surgery' and survival following oesophagogastric cancer surgery in Queensland: a population-level study.
Narendra A; Baade PD; Aitken JF; Fawcett J; Leggett B; Leggett C; Tian K; Sklavos T; Smithers BM
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Mar; 91(3):323-328. PubMed ID: 33155394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variation in death rate after abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in the United States: impact of hospital volume, gender, and age.
Dimick JB; Stanley JC; Axelrod DA; Kazmers A; Henke PK; Jacobs LA; Wakefield TW; Greenfield LJ; Upchurch GR
Ann Surg; 2002 Apr; 235(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 11923615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation in outcomes across surgeons meeting the Leapfrog volume standard for complex oncologic surgery.
Aquina CT; Becerra AZ; Fleming FJ; Cloyd JM; Tsung A; Pawlik TM; Ejaz A
Cancer; 2021 Nov; 127(21):4059-4071. PubMed ID: 34292582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of hospital volume on failure to rescue for complications requiring reoperation after elective colorectal surgery: multicentre propensity score-matched cohort study.
Grönroos-Korhonen MT; Koskenvuo LE; Mentula PJ; Nykänen TP; Koskensalo SK; Leppäniemi AK; Sallinen VJ
BJS Open; 2024 Mar; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 38597158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment at low-volume hospitals is associated with reduced short-term and long-term outcomes for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.
Keung EZ; Chiang YJ; Cormier JN; Torres KE; Hunt KK; Feig BW; Roland CL
Cancer; 2018 Dec; 124(23):4495-4503. PubMed ID: 30317543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continued Relevance of Minimum Volume Standards for Elective Esophagectomy: A National Perspective.
Gandjian M; Williamson C; Sanaiha Y; Hadaya J; Tran Z; Kim ST; Revels S; Benharash P
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Aug; 114(2):426-433. PubMed ID: 34437854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Esophageal Cancer in a Regionalized Care System in Ontario, Canada.
Habbous S; Yermakhanova O; Forster K; Holloway CMB; Darling G
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Sep; 4(9):e2126090. PubMed ID: 34546371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Refining the thoracic surgical oncology regionalization standards for esophageal surgery in Ontario, Canada: Moving from good to better.
Wright FC; Milkovich J; Hunter A; Darling G; Irish J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 166(6):1502-1509. PubMed ID: 37005118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Associations Between Hospital Volume and Overall Survival After Surgery in Older Patients with Breast Cancer.
Thalji SZ; Cortina CS; Frebault J; Cho Y; Thorgerson A; Bergom CR; Huang CC; Kong AL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 30(11):6462-6470. PubMed ID: 37314545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Impact of Hospital Size on National Trends and Outcomes Following Open Esophagectomy.
Hirji SA; Shah RM; Fields A; Orhurhu V; Bhulani N; White A; Mody GN; Swanson SJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Oct; 55(10):. PubMed ID: 31623325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
