These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29707364)
1. Assessment of a respiratory face mask for capturing air pollutants and pathogens including human influenza and rhinoviruses. Zhou SS; Lukula S; Chiossone C; Nims RW; Suchmann DB; Ijaz MK J Thorac Dis; 2018 Mar; 10(3):2059-2069. PubMed ID: 29707364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the filtration efficiency of commercial facemasks' materials against respiratory aerosol droplets. Patra SS; Nath J; Panda S; Das T; Ramasamy B J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 Jan; 72(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 34170783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Filter Efficiency of Medical Nonwoven Fabrics against Three Different Microbe Aerosols. Shimasaki N; Okaue A; Kikuno R; Shinohara K Biocontrol Sci; 2018; 23(2):61-69. PubMed ID: 29910210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Fit for Sealed and Loose-Fitting Surgical Masks and N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators. Karuppasamy K; Obuchowski N Ann Work Expo Health; 2021 May; 65(4):463-474. PubMed ID: 33458738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protecting healthcare workers from pandemic influenza: N95 or surgical masks? Gralton J; McLaws ML Crit Care Med; 2010 Feb; 38(2):657-67. PubMed ID: 20095070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Respiratory source control using surgical masks with nanofiber media. Skaria SD; Smaldone GC Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Jul; 58(6):771-81. PubMed ID: 24737728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol. Wen Z; Yu L; Yang W; Hu L; Li N; Wang J; Li J; Lu J; Dong X; Yin Z; Zhang K Aerobiologia (Bologna); 2013; 29(3):365-372. PubMed ID: 32214627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A smart mask for active defense against airborne pathogens. Kalavakonda RR; Masna NVR; Mandal S; Bhunia S Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19910. PubMed ID: 34620887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do N95 respirators provide 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks? Bałazy A; Toivola M; Adhikari A; Sivasubramani SK; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA Am J Infect Control; 2006 Mar; 34(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 16490606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variation in the fitted filtration efficiency of disposable face masks by sex. Pennington ER; Griffin JS; McInroe EM; Steinhardt W; Chen H; Samet JM; Prince SE J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38956275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of three face masks in preventing inhalation of airborne contaminants in dental practice. Checchi L; Montevecchi M; Moreschi A; Graziosi F; Taddei P; Violante FS J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Jul; 136(7):877-82. PubMed ID: 16060468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design and testing of a sew-free origami mask for improvised respiratory protection. Realmuto J; Kleinman MT; Sanger T; Lawler MJ; Smith JN Nanotechnology; 2023 Nov; 35(4):. PubMed ID: 37625393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Filtration Efficiency of Different Face Masks Against Aerosols. Stahl C; Frederick K; Chaudhary S; Morton CJ; Loy D; Muralidharan K; Sorooshian A; Parthasarathy S Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():654317. PubMed ID: 34277652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Viral Filtration Efficiency of Fabric Masks Compared with Surgical and N95 Masks. Whiley H; Keerthirathne TP; Nisar MA; White MAF; Ross KE Pathogens; 2020 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32957638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staphylococcus epidermidis is a safer surrogate of Staphylococcus aureus in testing bacterial filtration efficiency of face masks. Chiera S; Bosco F; Mollea C; Piscitello A; Sethi R; Nollo G; Caola I; Tessarolo F Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):21807. PubMed ID: 38071253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of selected n95 respirators and surgical masks when challenged with aerosolized endospores and inert particles. Davidson CS; Green CF; Gibbs SG; Schmid KK; Panlilio AL; Jensen PA; Scarpino PV J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(9):461-7. PubMed ID: 23915331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical face masks offer self-protection against aerosols: An evaluation using a practical in vitro approach on a dummy head. Sterr CM; Nickel IL; Stranzinger C; Nonnenmacher-Winter CI; Günther F PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0248099. PubMed ID: 33657178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Craniometric determinants of the fitted filtration efficiency of disposable masks. Griffin JS; McInroe EM; Pennington ER; Steinhardt W; Chen H; Prince SE; Samet JM Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1444411. PubMed ID: 39228845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance Comparison of Single and Double Masks: Filtration Efficiencies, Breathing Resistance and CO Htwe YZN; Mamat H; Osman B; Mahmud H Arab J Sci Eng; 2022 Apr; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 35402141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effectiveness of respiratory protection worn by communities to protect from volcanic ash inhalation. Part II: Total inward leakage tests. Steinle S; Sleeuwenhoek A; Mueller W; Horwell CJ; Apsley A; Davis A; Cherrie JW; Galea KS Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 221(6):977-984. PubMed ID: 29861400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]