179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29707614)
1. Comparison of inter- and intra-observer variability of breast density assessments using the fourth and fifth editions of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Alikhassi A; Esmaili Gourabi H; Baikpour M
Eur J Radiol Open; 2018; 5():67-72. PubMed ID: 29707614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Changes in BI-RADS Density Assessment Guidelines (Fourth Versus Fifth Edition) on Breast Density Assessment: Intra- and Interreader Agreements and Density Distribution.
Irshad A; Leddy R; Ackerman S; Cluver A; Pavic D; Abid A; Lewis MC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Dec; 207(6):1366-1371. PubMed ID: 27656766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of breast density assessments according to BI-RADS 4th and 5th editions and experience level.
Gemici AA; Bayram E; Hocaoglu E; Inci E
Acta Radiol Open; 2020 Jul; 9(7):2058460120937381. PubMed ID: 32733694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in determining breast density according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS® Atlas.
Pesce K; Tajerian M; Chico MJ; Swiecicki MP; Boietti B; Frangella MJ; Benitez S
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2020; 62(6):481-486. PubMed ID: 32493654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observer Variability of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon for Mammography.
Adibelli ZH; Ergenc R; Oztekin O; Ecevit S; Unal G; Abal Y
Breast Care (Basel); 2010 Mar; 5(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 22619635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
Ekpo EU; Ujong UP; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1119-23. PubMed ID: 26999655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast density (BD) assessment with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): Agreement between Quantra™ and 5th edition BI-RADS
Ekpo EU; Mello-Thoms C; Rickard M; Brennan PC; McEntee MF
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():185-190. PubMed ID: 27769015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring breast density: Comparing computer-automated breast density quantification with an observer-based method in a South African academic context.
Prinsloo E; Minné C; Greeff W
SA J Radiol; 2018; 22(2):1358. PubMed ID: 31754515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips.
Yoon JH; Kim MJ; Lee HS; Kim SH; Youk JH; Jeong SH; Kim YM
Ultrasonography; 2016 Oct; 35(4):318-26. PubMed ID: 27184655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project.
Gemici AA; Arıbal E; Özaydın AN; Gürdal SÖ; Özçınar B; Cabioğlu N; Özmen V
Eur J Breast Health; 2020 Apr; 16(2):110-116. PubMed ID: 32285032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Persistent inter-observer variability of breast density assessment using BI-RADS® 5th edition guidelines.
Portnow LH; Georgian-Smith D; Haider I; Barrios M; Bay CP; Nelson KP; Raza S
Clin Imaging; 2022 Mar; 83():21-27. PubMed ID: 34952487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation.
Gard CC; Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Taplin SH; Rutter CM
Breast J; 2015; 21(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 26133090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic Breast Density in Pakistani Women, Factors Affecting It, and Inter-Observer Variability in Assessment.
Fatima K; Mohsin F; Rao MO; Alvi MI
Cureus; 2021 Mar; 13(3):e14050. PubMed ID: 33898136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of BI-RADS-based subjective visual estimation of amount of fibroglandular breast tissue with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison to automated quantitative assessment.
Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Woitek R; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Baltzer PA; Vogl WD; Weber M; Meyer-Baese A; Pinker K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3917-3922. PubMed ID: 27108300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Breast density assessment and organised breast cancer screening].
Bambara AT; Ouédraogo NA; Ouédraogo PA; Bénao OLB; Ouédraogo W; Savadogo LGB; Ousséini D; Rabiou C
Bull Cancer; 2023 Sep; 110(9):903-911. PubMed ID: 37468338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
