These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29708061)

  • 1. Use of a Deep Recurrent Neural Network to Reduce Wind Noise: Effects on Judged Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality.
    Keshavarzi M; Goehring T; Zakis J; Turner RE; Moore BCJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518770964. PubMed ID: 29708061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient Noise Reduction Using a Deep Recurrent Neural Network: Effects on Subjective Speech Intelligibility and Listening Comfort.
    Keshavarzi M; Reichenbach T; Moore BCJ
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211041475. PubMed ID: 34606381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of effects on subjective intelligibility and quality of speech in babble for two algorithms: A deep recurrent neural network and spectral subtraction.
    Keshavarzi M; Goehring T; Turner RE; Moore BCJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1493. PubMed ID: 31067946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving Cochlear Implant Performance in the Wind Through Spectral Masking Release: A Multi-microphone and Multichannel Strategy.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):420-432. PubMed ID: 31425361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient two-microphone speech enhancement using basic recurrent neural network cell for hearing and hearing aids.
    Shankar N; Bhat GS; Panahi IMS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jul; 148(1):389. PubMed ID: 32752751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory inspired machine learning techniques can improve speech intelligibility and quality for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Monaghan JJ; Goehring T; Yang X; Bolner F; Wang S; Wright MC; Bleeck S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1985. PubMed ID: 28372043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Seeto A; Searchfield GD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Working memory, age, and hearing loss: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion.
    Arehart KH; Souza P; Baca R; Kates JM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 23291963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital noise reduction hearing aids in adults.
    Lakshmi MSK; Rout A; O'Donoghue CR
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Feb; 16(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 31502900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness.
    Kates JM; Arehart KH; Souza PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4458. PubMed ID: 25669257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing the impact of wind noise on cochlear implant processors with two microphones.
    Kokkinakis K; Cox C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):EL219-25. PubMed ID: 24815292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.