These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29708061)

  • 41. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality.
    van Buuren RA; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2903-13. PubMed ID: 10335639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Adaptive noise suppression for a dual-microphone hearing aid.
    Wouters J; Berghe JV; Maj JB
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):401-7. PubMed ID: 12403608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improving the performance of hearing aids in noisy environments based on deep learning technology.
    Lai YH; Zheng WZ; Tang ST; Fang SH; Liao WH; Tsao Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():404-408. PubMed ID: 30440419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Wireless binaural hearing aid technology for telephone use and listening in wind noise.
    Au A; Blakeley JM; Dowell RC; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Apr; 58(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 30474445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Frequency-lowering processing to improve speech-in-noise intelligibility in patients with age-related hearing loss.
    Bruno R; Freni F; Portelli D; Alberti G; Gazia F; Meduri A; Galletti F; Galletti B
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3697-3706. PubMed ID: 33083865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Preferred signal path delay and high-pass cut-off in open fittings.
    Bramsløw L
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):634-44. PubMed ID: 20602601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Is AGC beneficial in hearing aids?
    King AB; Martin MC
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Feb; 18(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 6722369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
    Summers V; Grant KW; Walden BE; Cord MT; Surr RK; Elhilali M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Improvements in intelligibility of noisy reverberant speech using a binaural subband adaptive noise-cancellation processing scheme.
    Shields PW; Campbell DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3232-42. PubMed ID: 11785824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 May; 16(5):270-7. PubMed ID: 16119254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sound quality and speech reception for prescribed hearing aid frequency responses.
    Leijon A; Lindkvist A; Ringdahl A; Israelsson B
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 1783227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acoustical and Perceptual Analysis of Noise Reduction Strategies in Individuals With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorders.
    Jaisinghani P; Manjula P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):4208-4218. PubMed ID: 33175645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of speech intelligibility and subjective quality with hearing-aid processing in older adults with hearing loss.
    Arehart KH; Chon SH; Lundberg EMH; Harvey LO; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Rallapalli VH; Souza PE
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Jan; 61(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 33913795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An overview of the HASPI and HASQI metrics for predicting speech intelligibility and speech quality for normal hearing, hearing loss, and hearing aids.
    Kates JM; Arehart KH
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108608. PubMed ID: 36137862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.