These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29708381)

  • 1. Do we know what we need? Preference for feedback about accurate performances does not benefit sensorimotor learning.
    Bastos FH; Tani G; Drews R; Riek S; Marinovic W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 29708381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining the Preferred Self-Controlled KR Schedules of Learners and Peers During Motor Skill Learning.
    McRae M; Patterson JT; Hansen S
    J Mot Behav; 2015; 47(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 25893852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External Control of Knowledge of Results: Learner Involvement Enhances Motor Skill Transfer.
    Figueiredo LS; Ugrinowitsch H; Freire AB; Shea JB; Benda RN
    Percept Mot Skills; 2018 Apr; 125(2):400-416. PubMed ID: 29350078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Self-Controlled Knowledge of Results on Learning a Taekwondo Serial Skill.
    Januário MS; Figueiredo LS; Portes LL; Benda RN
    Percept Mot Skills; 2019 Dec; 126(6):1178-1194. PubMed ID: 31422740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: the similarities and differences between physical and observational practice.
    Badets A; Blandin Y
    J Mot Behav; 2010; 42(4):257-68. PubMed ID: 20862778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.
    Carter MJ; Smith V; Carlsen AN; Ste-Marie DM
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):496-506. PubMed ID: 28243728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results without visual feedback in learning a golf-putting task.
    Ishikura T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):225-33. PubMed ID: 18459371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-Controlled Feedback in Motor Learning: The Effects Depend on the Frequency of Request.
    Drews R; Pacheco MM; Bastos FH; Tani G
    J Mot Behav; 2024; 56(5):555-567. PubMed ID: 38989724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of knowledge of results scheduling methods for promoting motor skill acquisition and retention.
    Weeks DL; Sherwood DE
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1994 Jun; 65(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 8047705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing Feedback Frequency in Motor Learning: Self-Controlled and Moderate Frequency KR Enhance Skill Acquisition.
    Hebert EP; Coker C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2021 Oct; 128(5):2381-2397. PubMed ID: 34338053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Augmented feedback for enhanced skill acquisition in individuals with traumatic brain injury.
    Croce R; Horvat M; Roswal G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):507-14. PubMed ID: 8724923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autonomy support and reduced feedback frequency have trivial effects on learning and performance of a golf putting task.
    McKay B; Ste-Marie DM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Jun; 71():102612. PubMed ID: 32452429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advantages of melodic over rhythmic movement sonification in bimanual motor skill learning.
    Dyer JF; Stapleton P; Rodger MWM
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3129-3140. PubMed ID: 28748311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. OPTIMAL practice conditions enhance the benefits of gradually increasing error opportunities on retention of a stepping sequence task.
    Levac D; Driscoll K; Galvez J; Mercado K; O'Neil L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Dec; 56(Pt B):129-138. PubMed ID: 29128736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor learning as a function of KR schedule and characteristics of task-intrinsic feedback.
    Anderson DI; Magill RA; Sekiya H
    J Mot Behav; 2001 Mar; 33(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 11265058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of knowledge of results (KR) frequency in the learning of a timing skill: absolute versus relative KR frequency.
    Vieira MM; Ugrinowitsch H; Oliveira FS; Gallo LG; Benda RN
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Oct; 115(2):360-9. PubMed ID: 23265002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-controlled KR schedules: does repetition order matter?
    Patterson JT; Carter MJ; Hansen S
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):567-79. PubMed ID: 24054895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-Controlled Feedback and Learner Impulsivity in Sequential Motor Learning.
    Ferreira BP; Malloy-Diniz LF; Parma JO; Nogueira NGHM; Apolinário-Souza T; Ugrinowitsch H; Lage GM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2019 Feb; 126(1):157-179. PubMed ID: 30398959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals.
    Patterson JT; Carter M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2010 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 20338655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional aging impairs the role of feedback in motor learning.
    Liu Y; Cao C; Yan JH
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2013 Oct; 13(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 23551381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.