These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29709124)

  • 1. 3D facial and dento-alveolar imaging.
    Freezer S; Fricker J
    Aust Orthod J; 2017 Feb; Spec No():73-86. PubMed ID: 29709124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Perioral Scan and Artificial Skin Markers on the Accuracy of Virtual Dentofacial Integration: Stereophotogrammetry Versus Smartphone Three-Dimensional Face-Scanning.
    Mai HN; Lee DH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33396780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of Mobile Device-Compatible 3D Scanners for Facial Digitization: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Mai HN; Lee DH
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e22228. PubMed ID: 33095178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of measurement accuracy of three facial scanners based on different scanning principles].
    Zhao YJ; Xiong YX; Yang HF; Wang Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Feb; 46(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24535353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Facial Scan for Facial Deformities in Clinics: A New Evaluation Method for Facial Scanner Accuracy.
    Zhao YJ; Xiong YX; Wang Y
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169402. PubMed ID: 28056044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3D Anthropometric Facial Imaging - A comparison of different 3D scanners.
    Koban KC; Perko P; Li Z; Xu Y; Giunta RE; Alfertshofer MG; Kohler LH; Freytag DL; Cotofana S; Frank K
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2022 May; 30(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 35501052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and reproducibility of the DAVID SLS-2 scanner in three-dimensional facial imaging.
    Secher JJ; Darvann TA; Pinholt EM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1662-1670. PubMed ID: 28847623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a Structured Light Scanner for 3D Facial Imaging: A Comparative Study with Direct Anthropometry.
    Major M; Mészáros B; Würsching T; Polyák M; Kammerhofer G; Németh Z; Szabó G; Nagy K
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Aug; 24(16):. PubMed ID: 39204985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a computer modelled forensic facial reconstruction technique using CT data from live subjects: a pilot study.
    Short LJ; Khambay B; Ayoub A; Erolin C; Rynn C; Wilkinson C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Apr; 237():147.e1-147.e8. PubMed ID: 24529418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Affordances of 3D and 4D Digital Technologies for Computerized Facial Depiction.
    Roughley MA; Wilkinson CM
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2019; 1138():87-101. PubMed ID: 31313260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the accuracy of a mobile and a stationary system for three-dimensional facial scanning.
    Modabber A; Peters F; Kniha K; Goloborodko E; Ghassemi A; Lethaus B; Hölzle F; Möhlhenrich SC
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1719-1724. PubMed ID: 27614543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
    Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate registration of cone-beam computed tomography scans to 3-dimensional facial photographs.
    Nahm KY; Kim Y; Choi YS; Lee J; Kim SH; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):256-64. PubMed ID: 24485741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integration of 3-D shapes of dentition and facial morphology using a high-speed laser scanner.
    Nagao M; Sohmura T; Kinuta S; Kojima T; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Takahashi J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 12066694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three-dimensional scanner systems for craniomaxillofacial imaging.
    Knoops PG; Beaumont CA; Borghi A; Rodriguez-Florez N; Breakey RW; Rodgers W; Angullia F; Jeelani NU; Schievano S; Dunaway DJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Apr; 70(4):441-449. PubMed ID: 28161205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An accuracy assessment of forensic computerized facial reconstruction employing cone-beam computed tomography from live subjects.
    Lee WJ; Wilkinson CM; Hwang HS
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):318-27. PubMed ID: 22073932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis.
    Nedelcu RG; Persson AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1461-71. PubMed ID: 25134995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FACE-R--a 3D database of 400 living individuals' full head CT- and face scans and preliminary GMM analysis for craniofacial reconstruction.
    Kustár A; Forró L; Kalina I; Fazekas F; Honti S; Makra S; Friess M
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1420-8. PubMed ID: 24020394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of a structured-light 3D scanner and an ultrasound imaging system for measurements of facial skin thickness.
    Lee KW; Kim SH; Gil YC; Hu KS; Kim HJ
    Clin Anat; 2017 Oct; 30(7):878-886. PubMed ID: 28589650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who is this person? A comparison study of current three-dimensional facial approximation methods.
    Decker S; Ford J; Davy-Jow S; Faraut P; Neville W; Hilbelink D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jun; 229(1-3):161.e1-8. PubMed ID: 23628365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.