182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29713543)
21. Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review.
Deruyver Y; Vanderschueren D; Van der Aa F
Andrology; 2014 Jan; 2(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 24193894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) as a sperm acquisition method for men with nonobstructive azoospermia seeking fertility: operative and laboratory aspects.
Esteves SC
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(3):440; discussion 441. PubMed ID: 23849579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predictive factors for sperm retrieval from males with azoospermia who are eligible for testicular sperm extraction (TESE).
Pavan-Jukic D; Stubljar D; Jukic T; Starc A
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2020 Feb; 66(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 31687848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In the era of micro-dissection sperm retrieval (m-TESE) is an isolated testicular biopsy necessary in the management of men with non-obstructive azoospermia?
Kalsi J; Thum MY; Muneer A; Abdullah H; Minhas S
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 21883824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Results of micro-TESE and outcomes of ICSI in patients with different etiological types of non-obstructive azoospermia].
Yang J; Ren XL; Gu LJ; Sun XJ; Song JY; Liu JH
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2018 Oct; 24(10):887-892. PubMed ID: 32212443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Salvage micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction; outcome in men with non-obstructive azoospermia with previous failed sperm retrievals.
Kalsi JS; Shah P; Thum Y; Muneer A; Ralph DJ; Minhas S
BJU Int; 2015 Sep; 116(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 25220441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Efficacy of percutaneous needle aspiration and open biopsy for sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.
Houwen J; Lundin K; Söderlund B; Bergh C; Kremer JA; Ekerhovd E
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(10):1033-8. PubMed ID: 18850334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Novel methods to enhance surgical sperm retrieval: a systematic review.
Kresch E; Efimenko I; Gonzalez D; Rizk PJ; Ramasamy R
Arab J Urol; 2021; 19(3):227-237. PubMed ID: 34552774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Is a contralateral testicular exploration required at microdissection testicular sperm extraction for men with nonobstructive azoospermia, cryptozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia?
Alkandari MH; Bouhadana D; Zini A
Andrologia; 2021 Dec; 53(11):e14208. PubMed ID: 34352113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Testicular fine-needle aspiration versus testicular open biopsy: Comparable sperm retrieval rate in selected patients.
Nowroozi MR; Ahmadi H; Ayati M; Jamshidian H; Sirous A
Indian J Urol; 2012 Jan; 28(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 22557715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction as an alternative for sperm acquisition in the most difficult cases of Azoospermia: Technique and preliminary results in India.
Ashraf MC; Singh S; Raj D; Ramakrishnan S; Esteves SC
J Hum Reprod Sci; 2013 Apr; 6(2):111-23. PubMed ID: 24082652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Outcome and predictive factors.
Ghalayini IF; Alazab R; Halalsheh O; Al-Mohtaseb AH; Al-Ghazo MA
Arab J Urol; 2022; 20(3):137-143. PubMed ID: 35935909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Combined Trifocal and Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction Enhances Sperm Retrieval Rate in Low-Chance Retrieval Non-Obstructive Azoospermia.
Falcone M; Boeri L; Timpano M; Cirigliano L; Preto M; Russo GI; Peretti F; Ferro I; Plamadeala N; Gontero P
J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35887821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Step-by-step loupes-mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermic men, a retrospective study.
Bouker A; Halouani L; Kharouf M; Latrous H; Makni M; Marrakchi O; Zouari R; Fourati S
Basic Clin Androl; 2019; 29():11. PubMed ID: 31338196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Severe testicular atrophy does not affect the success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction.
Bryson CF; Ramasamy R; Sheehan M; Palermo GD; Rosenwaks Z; Schlegel PN
J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 23911635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A novel stepwise micro-TESE approach in non obstructive azoospermia.
Franco G; Scarselli F; Casciani V; De Nunzio C; Dente D; Leonardo C; Greco PF; Greco A; Minasi MG; Greco E
BMC Urol; 2016 May; 16(1):20. PubMed ID: 27176005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bernie AM; Mata DA; Ramasamy R; Schlegel PN
Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1099-103.e1-3. PubMed ID: 26263080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Combined trifocal and microsurgical testicular sperm extraction is the best technique for testicular sperm retrieval in "low-chance" nonobstructive azoospermia.
Marconi M; Keudel A; Diemer T; Bergmann M; Steger K; Schuppe HC; Weidner W
Eur Urol; 2012 Oct; 62(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 22521095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Conventional testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and non-obstructive azoospermia: is there still a chance in the era of microdissection TESE? Results from a single non-academic community hospital.
Saccà A; Pastore AL; Roscigno M; Naspro R; Pellucchi F; Fuschi A; Maruccia S; Territo A; Pisano F; Zanga L; Capitanio E; Carbone A; Fusi F; Chinaglia D; Da Pozzo LF
Andrology; 2016 May; 4(3):425-9. PubMed ID: 26872565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Enzymatic tissue processing after testicular biopsy in non-obstructive azoospermia enhances sperm retrieval.
Vloeberghs V; De Munck N; Racca A; Mateizel I; Wouters K; Tournaye H
Hum Reprod Open; 2023; 2023(4):hoad039. PubMed ID: 37936829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
