310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29713771)
1. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: associations between diffusion metrics and histological prognostic factors.
Kim JY; Kim JJ; Kim S; Choo KS; Kim A; Kang T; Park H
Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3185-3193. PubMed ID: 29713771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can 3.0 Tesla diffusion tensor Imaging parameters be prognostic indicators in breast cancer?
Ozal ST; Inci E; Gemici AA; Turgut H; Cikot M; Karabulut M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 51():240-247. PubMed ID: 29886409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple sclerosis: hyperintense lesions in the brain on T1-weighted MR images assessed by diffusion tensor imaging.
Zhou F; Shiroishi M; Gong H; Zee CS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Apr; 31(4):789-95. PubMed ID: 20373421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast MRI during lactation: effects on tumor conspicuity using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) in comparison with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parametric maps.
Nissan N; Allweis T; Menes T; Brodsky A; Paluch-Shimon S; Haas I; Golan O; Miller Y; Barlev H; Carmon E; Brodsky M; Anaby D; Lawson P; Halshtok-Neiman O; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Faermann R; Konen E; Sklair-Levy M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):767-777. PubMed ID: 31529255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Tensor Imaging with Readout-segmented Echo-planar Imaging for Invasive Breast Cancer: Correlation of ADC and FA with Pathological Prognostic Markers.
Yamaguchi K; Nakazono T; Egashira R; Komori Y; Nakamura J; Noguchi T; Irie H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Jul; 16(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 27853053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging for the differentiation of breast lesions at 3 T MRI.
Tsougos I; Bakosis M; Tsivaka D; Athanassiou E; Fezoulidis I; Arvanitis D; Vassiou K
Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():25-31. PubMed ID: 30308430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in breast cancer and correlation with the prognostic factors.
Onaygil C; Kaya H; Ugurlu MU; Aribal E
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):660-672. PubMed ID: 27661775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating benign from malignant hepatic focal lesions.
Saleh GA; Elmokadem AH; Razek AA; El-Morsy A; Hamdy O; Eleraky ES; Saleh M
Eur Radiol; 2023 Feb; 33(2):1400-1411. PubMed ID: 35982336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion tensor imaging of rectal carcinoma: Clinical evaluation and its correlation with histopathological findings.
Yamada I; Yamauchi S; Uetake H; Yasuno M; Kinugasa Y; Saida Y; Tateishi U; Kobayashi D
Clin Imaging; 2020 Nov; 67():177-188. PubMed ID: 32829150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-tensor imaging for glioma grading at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging: analysis of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity.
Lee HY; Na DG; Song IC; Lee DH; Seo HS; Kim JH; Chang KH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 18379322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of diffusion and anisotropy in intracranial epidermoids using diffusion tensor metrics and p: q tensor decomposition.
Srinivasan K; Thomas B; Shah D; Kannath SK; Menon G; Sandhyamani S; Kesavadas C; Kapilamoorthy TR
J Neuroradiol; 2016 Dec; 43(6):363-370. PubMed ID: 27318387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffusion tensor imaging parameters in differentiation recurrent breast cancer from post-operative changes in patients with breast-conserving surgery.
Abdel Razek AAK; Zaky M; Bayoumi D; Taman S; Abdelwahab K; Alghandour R
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 111():76-80. PubMed ID: 30691669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy and tissue cellularity.
Jiang R; Ma Z; Dong H; Sun S; Zeng X; Li X
Br J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 89(1064):20160076. PubMed ID: 27302492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of diffusion tensor imaging and fractional anisotropy in the evaluation of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a literature review.
Siasios I; Kapsalaki EZ; Fountas KN; Fotiadou A; Dorsch A; Vakharia K; Pollina J; Dimopoulos V
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Sep; 41(3):E12. PubMed ID: 27581308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of DTI-derived fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T.
Tagliafico A; Rescinito G; Monetti F; Villa A; Chiesa F; Fisci E; Pace D; Calabrese M
Radiol Med; 2012 Sep; 117(6):992-1003. PubMed ID: 22580812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of cancellous bone quality in femoral neck of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects at 3T: Preliminary experience.
Manenti G; Capuani S; Fanucci E; Assako EP; Masala S; Sorge R; Iundusi R; Tarantino U; Simonetti G
Bone; 2013 Jul; 55(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 23507402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ using whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Kim JY; Kim JJ; Lee JW; Lee NK; Lee G; Kang T; Park H; Son YH; Grimm R
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30073498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in Gaussian diffusion tensor imaging and non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging model-based estimates of diffusion tensor invariants in the human brain.
Lanzafame S; Giannelli M; Garaci F; Floris R; Duggento A; Guerrisi M; Toschi N
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2464. PubMed ID: 27147357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Discriminating Between Benign Tissue, Low and High Gleason Grade Prostate Cancer.
Di Trani MG; Nezzo M; Caporale AS; De Feo R; Miano R; Mauriello A; Bove P; Manenti G; Capuani S
Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1328-1337. PubMed ID: 30545680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
