These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29714056)
21. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy? Zaninovic N; Irani M; Meseguer M Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):722-729. PubMed ID: 29101997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring. Kovacs P Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2014 Dec; 12():124. PubMed ID: 25510244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3. Petersen BM; Boel M; Montag M; Gardner DK Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-44. PubMed ID: 27609980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation. Aparicio-Ruiz B; Basile N; Pérez Albalá S; Bronet F; Remohí J; Meseguer M Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1379-1385.e10. PubMed ID: 27530063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Embryo selection using time-lapse analysis (Early Embryo Viability Assessment) in conjunction with standard morphology: a prospective two-center pilot study. Kieslinger DC; De Gheselle S; Lambalk CB; De Sutter P; Kostelijk EH; Twisk JW; van Rijswijk J; Van den Abbeel E; Vergouw CG Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2450-2457. PubMed ID: 27619774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A cautionary note against embryo aneuploidy risk assessment using time-lapse imaging. Ottolini C; Rienzi L; Capalbo A Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 24433755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Time-Lapse Imaging for the Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Primate Preimplantation Embryos. Daughtry BL; Chavez SL Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1769():293-317. PubMed ID: 29564832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation. Dal Canto M; Coticchio G; Mignini Renzini M; De Ponti E; Novara PV; Brambillasca F; Comi R; Fadini R Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Nov; 25(5):474-80. PubMed ID: 22995750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Time-lapse imaging of cleavage divisions in embryo quality assessment. Milewski R; Ajduk A Reproduction; 2017 Aug; 154(2):R37-R53. PubMed ID: 28408705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of a new clinically applicable device for embryo evaluation which measures embryo oxygen consumption. Kurosawa H; Utsunomiya H; Shiga N; Takahashi A; Ihara M; Ishibashi M; Nishimoto M; Watanabe Z; Abe H; Kumagai J; Terada Y; Igarashi H; Takahashi T; Fukui A; Suganuma R; Tachibana M; Yaegashi N Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 27609982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations. Sundvall L; Ingerslev HJ; Breth Knudsen U; Kirkegaard K Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3215-21. PubMed ID: 24070998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Focused time-lapse analysis reveals novel aspects of human fertilization and suggests new parameters of embryo viability. Coticchio G; Mignini Renzini M; Novara PV; Lain M; De Ponti E; Turchi D; Fadini R; Dal Canto M Hum Reprod; 2018 Jan; 33(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 29149327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Developmental kinetics of cleavage stage mouse embryos are related to their subsequent carbohydrate and amino acid utilization at the blastocyst stage. Lee YS; Thouas GA; Gardner DK Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):543-52. PubMed ID: 25567621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology. Kirkegaard K; Ahlström A; Ingerslev HJ; Hardarson T Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 25527231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Time-lapse deselection model for human day 3 in vitro fertilization embryos: the combination of qualitative and quantitative measures of embryo growth. Liu Y; Chapple V; Feenan K; Roberts P; Matson P Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):656-662.e1. PubMed ID: 26616439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Semiautomated analysis of embryoscope images: Using localized variance of image intensity to detect embryo developmental stages. Mölder A; Drury S; Costen N; Hartshorne GM; Czanner S Cytometry A; 2015 Feb; 87(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 25614363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go? Racowsky C; Kovacs P; Martins WP J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Jul; 32(7):1025-30. PubMed ID: 26126876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The datafication of reproduction: time-lapse embryo imaging and the commercialisation of IVF. van de Wiel L Sociol Health Illn; 2019 Oct; 41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):193-209. PubMed ID: 31599989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Abnormally cleaving embryos are able to produce live births: a time-lapse study. Fan YL; Han SB; Wu LH; Wang YP; Huang GN J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Mar; 33(3):379-385. PubMed ID: 26749387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of multinucleated blastomeres on embryo developmental competence, morphokinetics, and aneuploidy. Balakier H; Sojecki A; Motamedi G; Librach C Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):608-614.e2. PubMed ID: 27206619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]