These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29714071)

  • 1. The Irish approach to postaccident preparedness.
    McMahon CA; Smith V; Leonard K; Ryan R
    Ann ICRP; 2018 Oct; 47(3-4):260-269. PubMed ID: 29714071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?
    Ingram RJ
    Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):208-213. PubMed ID: 30086017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Off-site nuclear emergency management.
    Miska H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):83-7. PubMed ID: 15238662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The long-term management of nuclear emergencies: the principles.
    Baverstock K; Cherp A; Gray P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):3-5. PubMed ID: 15238648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NCRP 53RD Annual Meeting, Assessment of National Efforts in Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Terrorism: Communication, Education, and Public Information Session Q&A.
    Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30086019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regional long-term co-operation in the field of nuclear and radiation emergency preparedness.
    Sladek V; Metke E; Janko K; Hohenberg JK; Hofer P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):69-74. PubMed ID: 15238659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation protection issues on preparedness and response for a severe nuclear accident: experiences of the Fukushima accident.
    Homma T; Takahara S; Kimura M; Kinase S
    Ann ICRP; 2015 Jun; 44(1 Suppl):347-56. PubMed ID: 25915551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emergency management in the early phase.
    Crick M; McKenna T; Buglova E; Winkler G; Martincic R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 15238649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Organization of the nuclear emergency plan].
    Van Bladel L; Vandecasteele C
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):337-40. PubMed ID: 16408829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nuclear plant emergency preparedness in Russia.
    Sullivan RL
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5 Suppl):S169-79. PubMed ID: 19820472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introduction: off-site nuclear emergency management--capabilities and challenges.
    Hohenberg JK; Kelly N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):1. PubMed ID: 15238647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ongoing efforts to improve the international nuclear and radiological emergency response.
    Ugletveit F; Molhoek W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):149-50. PubMed ID: 15238675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response in the late phase to a radiological emergency.
    Morrey M; Nisbet A; Thome D; Savkin M; Hoe S; Brynildsen L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15238663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Capabilities of the RENEB network for research and large scale radiological and nuclear emergency situations.
    Monteiro Gil O; Vaz P; Romm H; De Angelis C; Antunes AC; Barquinero JF; Beinke C; Bortolin E; Burbidge CI; Cucu A; Della Monaca S; Domene MM; Fattibene P; Gregoire E; Hadjidekova V; Kulka U; Lindholm C; Meschini R; M'Kacher R; Moquet J; Oestreicher U; Palitti F; Pantelias G; Montoro Pastor A; Popescu IA; Quattrini MC; Ricoul M; Rothkamm K; Sabatier L; Sebastià N; Sommer S; Terzoudi G; Testa A; Trompier F; Vral A
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Jan; 93(1):136-141. PubMed ID: 27557790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experiences in methods to involve key players in planning protective actions in the case of a nuclear accident.
    Sinkko K; Hämäläinen RP; Hänninen R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15238670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision making for late-phase recovery from nuclear or radiological incidents.
    Chen SY
    Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 25551497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Belarus: towards a new post-chernobyl rehabilitation strategy.
    Trofimchik Z
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):141-5. PubMed ID: 15238673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. French policy for managing the post-accident phase of a nuclear accident.
    Gallay F; Godet JL; Niel JC
    Ann ICRP; 2015 Jun; 44(1 Suppl):172-8. PubMed ID: 25915552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment and evaluation of the radiological situation in the late phase of a nuclear accident.
    Gering F; Weiss W; Wirth E; Stapel R; Jacob P; Müller H; Pröhl G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):25-9. PubMed ID: 15238651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. national response assets for radiological incidents.
    Remick AL; Crapo JL; Woodruff CR
    Health Phys; 2005 Nov; 89(5):471-84. PubMed ID: 16217190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.