These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29714314)

  • 1. Completely blind image quality assessment via image gray-scale fluctuations and fractal dimension analysis.
    Yang X; Sun Q; Wang T
    Appl Opt; 2018 Apr; 57(12):3268-3280. PubMed ID: 29714314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blind image quality assessment via probabilistic latent semantic analysis.
    Yang X; Sun Q; Wang T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1714. PubMed ID: 27777850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator.
    Lin Zhang ; Lei Zhang ; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Aug; 24(8):2579-91. PubMed ID: 25915960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fractal analysis for reduced reference image quality assessment.
    Xu Y; Liu D; Quan Y; Le Callet P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Jul; 24(7):2098-109. PubMed ID: 25794391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blind Image Quality Assessment Based on High Order Statistics Aggregation.
    Jingtao Xu ; Peng Ye ; Qiaohong Li ; Haiqing Du ; Yong Liu ; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Sep; 25(9):4444-4457. PubMed ID: 27362977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning Receptive Fields and Quality Lookups for Blind Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Images.
    Shao F; Lin W; Wang S; Jiang G; Yu M; Dai Q
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2016 Mar; 46(3):730-43. PubMed ID: 25872220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning to rank for blind image quality assessment.
    Gao F; Tao D; Gao X; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2015 Oct; 26(10):2275-90. PubMed ID: 25616080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utilizing image scales towards totally training free blind image quality assessment.
    Saha A; Wu QM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1879-92. PubMed ID: 25775489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairs.
    Kede Ma ; Wentao Liu ; Tongliang Liu ; Zhou Wang ; Dacheng Tao
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Aug; 26(8):3951-3964. PubMed ID: 28574353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defining a no-reference image quality assessment by means of the self-affine analysis.
    Escobar JJM; Matamoros OM; Reyes IL; Padilla RT; Hernández LC
    Multimed Tools Appl; 2021; 80(9):14305-14320. PubMed ID: 33500679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blind Image Quality Assessment of Natural Scenes Based on Entropy Differences in the DCT Domain.
    Yang X; Li F; Zhang W; He L
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Nov; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 33266610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fractal-feature distance as a substitute for observer performance index in contrast-detail examination.
    Imai K; Ikeda M; Enchi Y; Niimi T
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):541-5. PubMed ID: 17689214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual Quality Assessment for Multi-Exposure Image Fusion.
    Ma K; Zeng K; Wang Z
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Nov; 24(11):3345-56. PubMed ID: 26068317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on the Fusion of Statistical and Perceptual Features.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2020 Jul; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 34460690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the signal subtle feature extraction performance based on dual improved fractal box dimension eigenvectors.
    Chen X; Li J; Han H; Ying Y
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 May; 5(5):180087. PubMed ID: 29892447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance assessment of methods for estimation of fractal dimension from scanning electron microscope images.
    Risović D; Pavlović Z
    Scanning; 2013; 35(6):402-11. PubMed ID: 23483485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment Based on the Entropy of DWT Coefficients of Locally Weighted Gradient Magnitudes.
    Golestaneh SA; Karam L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5293-5303. PubMed ID: 28113627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual Quality Evaluation of Image Object Segmentation: Subjective Assessment and Objective Measure.
    Shi R; Ngan KN; Li S; Paramesran R; Li H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Dec; 24(12):5033-45. PubMed ID: 26316130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No-reference image quality assessment using visual codebooks.
    Ye P; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jul; 21(7):3129-38. PubMed ID: 22410336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blind image quality assessment using joint statistics of gradient magnitude and Laplacian features.
    Xue W; Mou X; Zhang L; Bovik AC; Feng X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Nov; 23(11):4850-62. PubMed ID: 25216482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.