159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29715437)
1. A Factor Analysis of Functional Independence and Functional Assessment Measure Scores Among Focal and Diffuse Brain Injury Patients: The Importance of Bifactor Models.
Gunn S; Burgess GH; Maltby J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 99(9):1805-1810. PubMed ID: 29715437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 outcome measure is superior to UK FIM+FAM in a British military population.
McGilloway E; Mitchell J; Dharm-Datta S; Roberts A; Tilley H; Etherington J
Brain Inj; 2016; 30(10):1208-12. PubMed ID: 27467810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applying bifactor modelling to improve the clinical interpretive values of Functional Independence Measure in adults with acquired brain injury.
Gao F; Foster M; Newcombe P; Geraghty T
Disabil Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 42(12):1753-1761. PubMed ID: 30499346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of intensive outpatient neuro-rehabilitation outcomes using FIM+FAM(UK).
Wilson FC; Wheatley-Smith L; Downes C
NeuroRehabilitation; 2009; 24(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19597276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM + FAM.
Turner-Stokes L; Siegert RJ
Disabil Rehabil; 2013; 35(22):1885-95. PubMed ID: 23384240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Staged residential post-acute rehabilitation for adults following acquired brain injury: A comparison of functional gains rated on the UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM) and the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4).
Jackson D; Seaman K; Sharp K; Singer R; Wagland J; Turner-Stokes L
Brain Inj; 2017; 31(11):1405-1413. PubMed ID: 28898132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The utility of the FIM+FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes.
Seel RT; Wright G; Wallace T; Newman S; Dennis L
J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2007; 22(5):267-77. PubMed ID: 17878768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury.
Houlden H; Edwards M; McNeil J; Greenwood R
Clin Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 20(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 16541936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM): Psychometric Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Specialist Rehabilitation following a Stroke from the National UK Clinical Dataset.
Nayar M; Vanderstay R; Siegert RJ; Turner-Stokes L
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147288. PubMed ID: 26824696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of the functional assessment measure after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation.
Gurka JA; Felmingham KL; Baguley IJ; Schotte DE; Crooks J; Marosszeky JE
J Head Trauma Rehabil; 1999 Jun; 14(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 10381977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disability in patients following traumatic brain injury--which measure?
McPherson KM; Pentland B
Int J Rehabil Res; 1997 Mar; 20(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9089011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Goal attainment scaling: does it provide added value as a person-centred measure for evaluation of outcome in neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury?
Turner-Stokes L; Williams H; Johnson J
J Rehabil Med; 2009 Jun; 41(7):528-35. PubMed ID: 19543663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interrater reliability of the Functional Assessment Measure in a brain injury rehabilitation program.
Donaghy S; Wass PJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Oct; 79(10):1231-6. PubMed ID: 9779676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of the FIM instrument in the inpatient burn rehabilitation population.
Gerrard P; Goldstein R; Divita MA; Ryan CM; Mix J; Niewczyk P; Kazis L; Kowalske K; Zafonte R; Schneider JC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1521-1526.e4. PubMed ID: 23473701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing activities of daily living using FIM-FAM scoring system before starting adjuvant treatment in patients with brain tumors: results from a prospective study.
Dutta D; Vanere P; Gupta T; Munshi A; Jalali R
J Neurooncol; 2009 Aug; 94(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 19255726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Community Integration Questionnaire revisited: an assessment of factor structure and validity.
Sander AM; Fuchs KL; High WM; Hall KM; Kreutzer JS; Rosenthal M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 Oct; 80(10):1303-8. PubMed ID: 10527092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between cognition and functional independence in adults with traumatic brain injury.
Kaplan CP; Corrigan JD
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Jun; 75(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 8002762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals.
Hall KM; Bushnik T; Lakisic-Kazazic B; Wright J; Cantagallo A
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 82(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 11245760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes for older adults in inpatient specialist neurorehabilitation.
Khoo TC; FitzGerald A; MacDonald E; Bradley L
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Jul; 63(4):340-343. PubMed ID: 31129224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential item functioning of the Functional Independence Measure in higher performing neurological patients.
Dallmeijer AJ; Dekker J; Roorda LD; Knol DL; van Baalen B; de Groot V; Schepers VP; Lankhorst GJ
J Rehabil Med; 2005 Nov; 37(6):346-52. PubMed ID: 16287665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
