These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29716257)

  • 1. Assessing the importance of several acoustic properties to the perception of spontaneous speech.
    Podlubny RG; Nearey TM; Kondrak G; Tucker BV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2255. PubMed ID: 29716257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic correlates of female confidence: A production and comprehension study.
    Roche JM; Morgan SD; Fissel Brannick S; Bryndel K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3410. PubMed ID: 31255138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling the perception of children's age from speech acoustics.
    Barreda S; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):EL361. PubMed ID: 29857760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.
    Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regressive spectral assimilation bias in speech perception.
    Rysling A; Jesse A; Kingston J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1127-1146. PubMed ID: 31114954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual learning of phonetic information that indicates morphological structure.
    Barden K; Hawkins S
    Phonetica; 2013; 70(4):323-42. PubMed ID: 24514161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of intelligibility on within- and cross-modal sentence recognition memory for native and non-native listeners.
    Keerstock S; Smiljanić R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2871. PubMed ID: 30522310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic encoding of speech sequence probability in human temporal cortex.
    Leonard MK; Bouchard KE; Tang C; Chang EF
    J Neurosci; 2015 May; 35(18):7203-14. PubMed ID: 25948269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The interrelation between acoustic context effects and available response categories in speech sound categorization.
    Benders T; Escudero P; Sjerps MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3079-87. PubMed ID: 22501081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of signal bandwidth and noise on individual speaker identification.
    Schwartz JC; Whyte AT; Al-Nuaimi M; Donai JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):EL447. PubMed ID: 30522302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
    Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory-neurophysiological responses to speech during early childhood: Effects of background noise.
    White-Schwoch T; Davies EC; Thompson EC; Woodruff Carr K; Nicol T; Bradlow AR; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():34-47. PubMed ID: 26113025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Music training enhances the automatic neural processing of foreign speech sounds.
    Intartaglia B; White-Schwoch T; Kraus N; Schön D
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12631. PubMed ID: 28974695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Categorical Speech Perception in Adults with Autism Spectrum Conditions.
    Stewart ME; Petrou AM; Ota M
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2018 Jan; 48(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 28894969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.