BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29716261)

  • 1. Effects of language experience and task demands on talker recognition by children and adults.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2409. PubMed ID: 29716261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The native-language benefit for talker identification is robust in 7.5-month-old infants.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1911-1920. PubMed ID: 29698034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological considerations for interpreting the Language Familiarity Effect in talker processing.
    Levi SV
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 10(2):e1483. PubMed ID: 30328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developmental improvements in talker recognition are specific to the native language.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Feb; 202():104991. PubMed ID: 33096370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Language exposure facilitates talker learning prior to language comprehension, even in adults.
    Orena AJ; Theodore RM; Polka L
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():36-40. PubMed ID: 26113447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abstraction and the (Misnamed) Language Familiarity Effect.
    Johnson EK; Bruggeman L; Cutler A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Mar; 42(2):633-645. PubMed ID: 28744902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.
    Case J; Seyfarth S; Levi SV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 29800358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toddlers' comprehension of adult and child talkers: Adult targets versus vocal tract similarity.
    Cooper A; Fecher N; Johnson EK
    Cognition; 2018 Apr; 173():16-20. PubMed ID: 29287204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children.
    Levi SV
    J Child Lang; 2015 Jul; 42(4):843-72. PubMed ID: 25159173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bilingual infants excel at foreign-language talker recognition.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    Dev Sci; 2019 Jul; 22(4):e12778. PubMed ID: 30485599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading ability influences native and non-native voice recognition, even for unimpaired readers.
    Kadam MA; Orena AJ; Theodore RM; Polka L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):EL6-12. PubMed ID: 26827051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural basis of language familiarity effects on voice recognition: An fNIRS study.
    Meng Y; Liang C; Chen W; Liu Z; Yang C; Hu J; Gao Z; Gao S
    Cortex; 2024 Jul; 176():1-10. PubMed ID: 38723449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Other Accent Effect in Talker Recognition: Now You See It, Now You Don't.
    Yu ME; Schertz J; Johnson EK
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12986. PubMed ID: 34170043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.