These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29716261)

  • 21. The Other Accent Effect in Talker Recognition: Now You See It, Now You Don't.
    Yu ME; Schertz J; Johnson EK
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12986. PubMed ID: 34170043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learning to recognize speakers of a non-native language: implications for the functional organization of human auditory cortex.
    Perrachione TK; Wong PC
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1899-910. PubMed ID: 17258240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preschoolers' use of talker information in on-line comprehension.
    Creel SC
    Child Dev; 2012 Nov; 83(6):2042-56. PubMed ID: 22803622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differential neural contributions to native- and foreign-language talker identification.
    Perrachione TK; Pierrehumbert JB; Wong PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1950-60. PubMed ID: 19968445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
    Corbin NE; Bonino AY; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26226605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Revisiting the talker recognition advantage in bilingual infants.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Feb; 214():105276. PubMed ID: 34507181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience.
    Johnson EK; Westrek E; Nazzi T; Cutler A
    Dev Sci; 2011 Sep; 14(5):1002-11. PubMed ID: 21884316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Audiovisual speech facilitates voice learning.
    Sheffert SM; Olson E
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 15129754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identifying children's voices.
    Cooper A; Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jul; 148(1):324. PubMed ID: 32752764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Age-related changes in talker recognition with reduced spectral cues.
    Vongpaisal T; Trehub SE; Glenn Schellenberg E; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):501-8. PubMed ID: 22280611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults.
    Creel SC; Jimenez SR
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Dec; 113(4):487-509. PubMed ID: 22958962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Effect of Talker Familiarity on Sentence Recognition Accuracy in Complex Noise.
    Buntrock MS; Barker BA; Gurries MM; Barrett TS
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Jan; 68(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 34109807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Toddlers’ Word Recognition in an Unfamiliar Regional Accent: The Role of Local Sentence Context and Prior Accent Exposure.
    van Heugten M; Johnson EK
    Lang Speech; 2016 Sep; 59(Pt 3):353-63. PubMed ID: 29924530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Language familiarity modulates relative attention to the eyes and mouth of a talker.
    Barenholtz E; Mavica L; Lewkowicz DJ
    Cognition; 2016 Feb; 147():100-5. PubMed ID: 26649759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.