These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29716295)

  • 1. Noise-robust speech triage.
    Bartos AL; Cipr T; Nelson DJ; Schwarz P; Banowetz J; Jerabek L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2313. PubMed ID: 29716295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Lutman ME; Ewert SD; Li G; Bleeck S
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Diagonal-Steering-Based Binaural Beamforming Algorithm Incorporating a Diagonal Speech Localizer for Persons With Bilateral Hearing Impairment.
    Lee JC; Nam KW; Jang DP; Kim IY
    Artif Organs; 2015 Dec; 39(12):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25959133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech onset enhancement improves intelligibility in adverse listening conditions for cochlear implant users.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():13-22. PubMed ID: 27697583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.
    Hersbach AA; Grayden DB; Fallon JB; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2412-20. PubMed ID: 23556606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of a priori signal-to-noise ratio using neurograms for speech enhancement.
    Jassim WA; Harte N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3830. PubMed ID: 32611151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CNN-based noise reduction for multi-channel speech enhancement system with discrete wavelet transform (DWT) preprocessing.
    Cherukuru P; Mustafa MB
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2024; 10():e1901. PubMed ID: 38435554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Robust Speaker Identification System Using the Responses from a Model of the Auditory Periphery.
    Islam MA; Jassim WA; Cheok NS; Zilany MS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158520. PubMed ID: 27392046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A long term effect on speech recognition in the patients with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants].
    Wang B; Wei CG; Cao KL; Jin X; Wang Y; Wang NY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):189-195. PubMed ID: 29614551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial perception of speech in various signal to noise ratios.
    Abouchacra KS; Emanuel DC; Blood IM; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 1998 Aug; 19(4):298-309. PubMed ID: 9728725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Wiinberg A; Zaar J; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518775293. PubMed ID: 29756553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
    Holder JT; Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectro-temporal modulation energy based mask for robust speaker identification.
    Chi TS; Lin TH; Hsu CC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):EL368-74. PubMed ID: 22559454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.