These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29716564)
1. Assessment of the quality of patient-oriented information over internet on testicular cancer. Prasanth AS; Jayarajah U; Mohanappirian R; Seneviratne SA BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):491. PubMed ID: 29716564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of the patient-oriented web-based information on esophageal cancer. Jayasinghe R; Ranasinghe S; Jayarajah U; Seneviratne S J Cancer Educ; 2022 Jun; 37(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 32803566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of online information for the general public on COVID-19. Jayasinghe R; Ranasinghe S; Jayarajah U; Seneviratne S Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Aug; 103(12):2594-7. PubMed ID: 32800422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronary angioplasty and the internet: what can patients searching online expect to find? Kirthi V; Modi BN J Interv Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 25(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 22672356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of information available over internet on laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Jayaweera JM; De Zoysa MI J Minim Access Surg; 2016; 12(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 27609327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Available web-based dental implants information for patients. How good is it? Leira-Feijoo Y; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Blanco-Carrión J; Seoane J; Varela-Centelles P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1276-80. PubMed ID: 25041413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet. Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Your patient information website: how good is it? Soobrah R; Clark SK Colorectal Dis; 2012 Mar; 14(3):e90-4. PubMed ID: 21883807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information. McMorrow SM; Millett DT J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 43(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 27485895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review. Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea. Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testicular Cancer on the Web-an Appropriate Source of Patient Information in Concordance with the European Association of Urology Guidelines? Paffenholz P; Salem J; Borgmann H; Nestler T; Pfister D; Ruf C; Tsaur I; Haferkamp A; Heidenreich A J Cancer Educ; 2018 Dec; 33(6):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 28776306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of English Websites on Dental Caries by Using Consumer Evaluation Tools. Blizniuk A; Furukawa S; Ueno M; Kawaguchi Y Oral Health Prev Dent; 2016; 14(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 26973989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders. O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Quality of Rhinoplasty Health Information on the Internet. Haymes AT Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Feb; 76(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 26761153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet. Grewal P; Alagaratnam S Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 23523948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate Cancer on the Web-Expedient Tool for Patients' Decision-Making? Borgmann H; Wölm JH; Vallo S; Mager R; Huber J; Breyer J; Salem J; Loeb S; Haferkamp A; Tsaur I J Cancer Educ; 2017 Mar; 32(1):135-140. PubMed ID: 26234650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia. Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Information on Common Prosthodontic Treatments. Alshehri A; Alghofaili N; ALshunaiber R; Alkadi L Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):62–67. PubMed ID: 33651024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An assessment of the readability and quality of elective orthopaedic information on the Internet. O'Neill SC; Nagle M; Baker JF; Rowan FE; Tierney S; Quinlan JF Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Jun; 80(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 25090785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]