These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29717948)

  • 21. Able to choose? Women's thoughts and experiences regarding informed choices during birth.
    Bringedal H; Aune I
    Midwifery; 2019 Oct; 77():123-129. PubMed ID: 31323487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can women's autonomy impede male involvement in pregnancy health in Katmandu, Nepal?
    Mullany BC; Hindin MJ; Becker S
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1993-2006. PubMed ID: 15922498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A participatory action research study exploring women's understandings of the concept of informed choice during pregnancy and childbirth in Ireland.
    O'Brien D; Butler MM; Casey M
    Midwifery; 2017 Mar; 46():1-7. PubMed ID: 28092814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Caring for women making unconventional birth choices: A meta-ethnography exploring the views, attitudes, and experiences of midwives.
    Feeley C; Thomson G; Downe S
    Midwifery; 2019 May; 72():50-59. PubMed ID: 30776740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Midwife-led maternity services and consumer 'choice' in an Australian metropolitan region.
    Zadoroznyj M
    Midwifery; 2000 Sep; 16(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10970751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Listening to women's voices: the experience of giving birth with paramedic care in Queensland, Australia.
    Flanagan B; Lord B; Reed R; Crimmins G
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 19(1):490. PubMed ID: 31856736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Women's views on partnership working with midwives during pregnancy and childbirth.
    Boyle S; Thomas H; Brooks F
    Midwifery; 2016 Jan; 32():21-9. PubMed ID: 26597110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Women's experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.
    Yuill C; McCourt C; Cheyne H; Leister N
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jun; 20(1):343. PubMed ID: 32517734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gaining insight into how women conceptualize satisfaction: Western Australian women's perception of their maternity care experiences.
    Lewis L; Hauck YL; Ronchi F; Crichton C; Waller L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():29. PubMed ID: 26846257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study.
    Feeley C; Thomson G
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Mar; 16():59. PubMed ID: 27000100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A national survey of women's views of their maternity care in Scotland.
    Hundley V; Rennie AM; Fitzmaurice A; Graham W; van Teijlingen E; Penney G
    Midwifery; 2000 Dec; 16(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 11080466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Women's opinions about mode of birth in Brazil: a qualitative study in a public teaching hospital.
    Kasai KE; Nomura RM; Benute GR; de Lucia MC; Zugaib M
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 18842327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patient perceptions of a decision support tool to assist with young women's contraceptive choice.
    Marshall C; Nuru-Jeter A; Guendelman S; Mauldon J; Raine-Bennett T
    Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Feb; 100(2):343-348. PubMed ID: 27578270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Facilitating women's choice in maternity care.
    Nieuwenhuijze M; Low LK
    J Clin Ethics; 2013; 24(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 24282854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. 'It made you think twice' - an interview study of women's perception of a web-based decision aid concerning screening and diagnostic testing for fetal anomalies.
    Åhman A; Sarkadi A; Lindgren P; Rubertsson C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Sep; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27619366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sense of coherence and childbearing choices: A cross sectional survey.
    Ferguson S; Davis D; Browne J; Taylor J
    Midwifery; 2015 Nov; 31(11):1081-6. PubMed ID: 26299371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Choice and birth method: mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request.
    Kingdon C; Neilson J; Singleton V; Gyte G; Hart A; Gabbay M; Lavender T
    BJOG; 2009 Jun; 116(7):886-95. PubMed ID: 19385961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using a pregnancy decision support program for women choosing birth after a previous caesarean in Japan: A mixed methods study.
    Torigoe I; Shorten A
    Women Birth; 2018 Feb; 31(1):e9-e19. PubMed ID: 28705428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 'They aren't really black fellas but they are easy to talk to': Factors which influence Australian Aboriginal women's decision to disclose intimate partner violence during pregnancy.
    Spangaro J; Herring S; Koziol-Mclain J; Rutherford A; Frail MA; Zwi AB
    Midwifery; 2016 Oct; 41():79-88. PubMed ID: 27551857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Delivering information: a descriptive study of Australian women's information needs for decision-making about birth facility.
    Thompson R; Wojcieszek AM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Jun; 12():51. PubMed ID: 22708648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.