These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29718514)
1. Statistical Power in Nursing Education Research. Spurlock DR; Taylor J; Spurlock D J Nurs Educ; 2018 May; 57(5):262-264. PubMed ID: 29718514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Single-Group, Pre- and Posttest Design in Nursing Education Research: It's Time to Move on. Spurlock DR J Nurs Educ; 2018 Feb; 57(2):69-71. PubMed ID: 29384566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Purpose and Power of Reporting Effect Sizes in Nursing Education Research. Spurlock D J Nurs Educ; 2017 Nov; 56(11):645-647. PubMed ID: 29091232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond p < .05: Toward a Nightingalean Perspective on Statistical Significance for Nursing Education Researchers. Spurlock D J Nurs Educ; 2017 Aug; 56(8):453-455. PubMed ID: 28787066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research. Gaskin CJ; Happell B Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuing pain education in nursing: a literature review. Francke AL; Garssen B; Abu-Saad HH Int J Nurs Stud; 1996 Oct; 33(5):567-78. PubMed ID: 8886905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When "Little Is Known" Is Not Entirely True. Spurlock D J Nurs Educ; 2019 May; 58(5):257-259. PubMed ID: 31039258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Defining Practical Significance Is Hard, But We Should Do It Anyway. Spurlock D J Nurs Educ; 2019 Nov; 58(11):623-626. PubMed ID: 31665525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodological considerations of undertaking research with clinical mentors in the UK: a critical review of the literature. Jinks AM Nurse Educ Today; 2007 Oct; 27(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 17169465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Guide to Guidelines for Nursing Education Researchers. Spurlock D J Nurs Educ; 2019 Feb; 58(2):69-71. PubMed ID: 30721305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Types of research designs. Davis DW Neonatal Netw; 2003; 22(5):65-7. PubMed ID: 14598981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 'Stories' or 'snapshots'? A study directed at comparing qualitative and quantitative approaches to curriculum evaluation. Pateman B; Jinks AM Nurse Educ Today; 1999 Jan; 19(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 10222972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative assessment of interactive video instruction. Castner LJ Comput Nurs; 1994; 12(2):78-9. PubMed ID: 8199927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Advancing the science of research in nursing education: contributions of the critical decision method. McNelis AM; Ironside PM; Zvonar SE; Ebright PR J Nurs Educ; 2014 Feb; 53(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 24444010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical conclusion validity and type IV errors in rehabilitation research. Ottenbacher KJ Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Feb; 73(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 1543405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]