BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29719083)

  • 1. Feasibility and principal acceptability of school-based mobile communication applications to disseminate healthy lunchbox messages to parents.
    Reynolds R; Sutherland R; Nathan N; Janssen L; Lecathelinais C; Reilly K; Walton A; Wolfenden L
    Health Promot J Austr; 2019 Jan; 30(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 29719083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized controlled trial to assess the potential efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of an m-health intervention targeting parents of school aged children to improve the nutritional quality of foods packed in the lunchbox 'SWAP IT'.
    Sutherland R; Nathan N; Brown A; Yoong S; Finch M; Lecathelinais C; Reynolds R; Walton A; Janssen L; Desmet C; Gillham K; Herrmann V; Hall A; Wiggers J; Wolfenden L
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2019 Jul; 16(1):54. PubMed ID: 31266506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protocol for an effectiveness- implementation hybrid trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an m-health intervention to decrease the consumption of discretionary foods packed in school lunchboxes: the 'SWAP IT' trial.
    Sutherland R; Brown A; Nathan N; Janssen L; Reynolds R; Walton A; Hudson N; Chooi A; Yoong S; Wiggers J; Bailey A; Evans N; Gillham K; Oldmeadow C; Searles A; Reeves P; Rissel C; Davies M; Reilly K; Cohen B; McCallum T; Wolfenden L
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1510. PubMed ID: 31718597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online canteens: awareness, use, barriers to use, and the acceptability of potential online strategies to improve public health nutrition in primary schools.
    Wyse R; Yoong SL; Dodds P; Campbell L; Delaney T; Nathan N; Janssen L; Reilly K; Sutherland R; Wiggers J; Wolfenden L
    Health Promot J Austr; 2017 Mar; 28(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 27136723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Multicomponent mHealth-Based Intervention (SWAP IT) to Decrease the Consumption of Discretionary Foods Packed in School Lunchboxes: Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Sutherland R; Brown A; Nathan N; Yoong S; Janssen L; Chooi A; Hudson N; Wiggers J; Kerr N; Evans N; Gillham K; Oldmeadow C; Searles A; Reeves P; Davies M; Reilly K; Cohen B; Wolfenden L
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jun; 23(6):e25256. PubMed ID: 34185013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cross-sectional study to determine the energy density and nutritional quality of primary-school children's lunchboxes.
    Sutherland R; Nathan N; Brown A; Yoong S; Reynolds R; Walton A; Janssen L; Desmet C; Lecathelinais C; Gillham K; Herrmann V; Wolfenden L
    Public Health Nutr; 2020 Apr; 23(6):1108-1116. PubMed ID: 31969199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cluster randomised controlled trial of an m-health intervention in centre-based childcare services to reduce the packing of discretionary foods in children's lunchboxes: study protocol for the 'SWAP IT Childcare' trial.
    Pond N; Finch M; Sutherland R; Wolfenden L; Nathan N; Kingsland M; Grady A; Gillham K; Herrmann V; Yoong SL
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(5):e026829. PubMed ID: 31154306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Cancer Council NSW Eat It To Beat It Healthy Lunch Box Sessions: A short intervention to promote the intake of fruit and vegetables among families of primary school children in NSW Australia.
    Mihrshahi S; Foley B; Nguyen B; Gander K; Tan N; Hudson N; Hughes C; Hector D; Bauman A
    Health Promot J Austr; 2019 Jan; 30(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 30648332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost and Cost Effectiveness of a Pilot m-Health Intervention Targeting Parents of School-Aged Children to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Foods Packed in the Lunchbox.
    Brown A; Sutherland R; Reeves P; Nathan N; Wolfenden L
    Nutrients; 2021 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 34836391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing the potential effects of text messages delivered via an m-health intervention to improve packing of healthy school lunchboxes.
    Brown A; Sutherland R; Janssen L; Hudson N; Chooi A; Reynolds R; Walton A; Lecathelinais C; Reilly K; Nathan N; Wolfenden L
    Public Health Nutr; 2021 Jul; 24(10):2867-2876. PubMed ID: 33050974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nutrition education in the Australian New South Wales primary school curriculum: An exploration of time allocation, translation and attitudes in a sample of teachers.
    de Vlieger N; Riley N; Miller A; Collins CE; Bucher T
    Health Promot J Austr; 2019 Jan; 30(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 30054958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic evaluation of digital nutrition promotion websites and apps for supporting parents to influence children's nutrition.
    Zarnowiecki D; Mauch CE; Middleton G; Matwiejczyk L; Watson WL; Dibbs J; Dessaix A; Golley RK
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 32041640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. School food policy at Dutch primary schools: room for improvement? Cross-sectional findings from the INPACT study.
    van Ansem WJ; Schrijvers CT; Rodenburg G; Schuit AJ; van de Mheen D
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Apr; 13():339. PubMed ID: 23587089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What's in the lunchbox? Dietary behaviour of learners from disadvantaged schools in the Western Cape, South Africa.
    Abrahams Z; de Villiers A; Steyn NP; Fourie J; Dalais L; Hill J; Draper CE; Lambert EV
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Oct; 14(10):1752-8. PubMed ID: 21729474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barriers to Nutrition Promotion in Private Secondary Schools in Kolkata, India: Perspectives of Parents and Teachers.
    Rathi N; Riddell L; Worsley A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jun; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 29857589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of positive outcomes of a school food provision policy in Australia.
    Pettigrew S; Donovan RJ; Jalleh G; Pescud M
    Health Promot Int; 2014 Jun; 29(2):317-27. PubMed ID: 23297338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 5-2-1-0 goes to school: a pilot project testing the feasibility of schools adopting and delivering healthy messages during the school day.
    Rogers VW; Motyka E
    Pediatrics; 2009 Jun; 123 Suppl 5():S272-6. PubMed ID: 19470603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence of current school-level nutrition policies and practices of secondary schools in NSW, Australia.
    Ooi JY; Yoong SL; Sutherland R; Wrigley J; Lecathelinais C; Reilly K; Janssen L; Nathan N; Wolfenden L
    Health Promot J Austr; 2021 Apr; 32(2):216-226. PubMed ID: 32347588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New models to support parents to pack healthy lunchboxes: Parents acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and adoption of the SWAP IT m-Health program.
    Brown A; Nathan N; Janssen L; Chooi A; Lecathelinais C; Hudson N; Wolfenden L; Sutherland R
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2023 Jun; 47(3):100043. PubMed ID: 37087847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unpacking the cost of the lunchbox for Australian families: a secondary analysis.
    Manson AC; Johnson BJ; Wolfenden L; Sutherland R; Golley RK
    Health Promot Int; 2024 Feb; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 38198723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.