These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

786 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29720220)

  • 21. Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Dembrower K; Liu Y; Azizpour H; Eklund M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Strand F
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 31845842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk in Western Australian Aboriginal women.
    Darcey E; Lloyd R; Cadby G; Pilkington L; Redfern A; Thompson SC; Saunders C; Wylie E; Stone J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 176(1):235-242. PubMed ID: 30977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiomic Phenotypes of Mammographic Parenchymal Complexity: Toward Augmenting Breast Density in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Kontos D; Winham SJ; Oustimov A; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Gastounioti A; Whaley DH; Hruska CB; Kerlikowske K; Brandt K; Conant EF; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 30375931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
    Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with False-Positive Results according to Mammographic Features.
    Castells X; Torá-Rocamora I; Posso M; Román M; Vernet-Tomas M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Domingo L; Vidal C; Baré M; Ferrer J; Quintana MJ; Sánchez M; Natal C; Espinàs JA; Saladié F; Sala M;
    Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 26878225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark.
    von Euler-Chelpin M; Lillholm M; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Lynge E
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Oct; 21(1):111. PubMed ID: 31623646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
    Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term Accuracy of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Combining Classic Risk Factors and Breast Density.
    Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Buist DSM; Bowles EJA
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Sep; 4(9):e180174. PubMed ID: 29621362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changes in mammographic density over time and the risk of breast cancer: An observational cohort study.
    Román M; Sala M; Baré M; Posso M; Vidal C; Louro J; Sánchez M; Peñalva L; Castells X;
    Breast; 2019 Aug; 46():108-115. PubMed ID: 31132476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Association of the Interaction Between Mammographic Breast Density, Body Mass Index, and Menopausal Status With Breast Cancer Risk Among Korean Women.
    Tran TXM; Moon SG; Kim S; Park B
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2139161. PubMed ID: 34940866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Gastounioti A; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 27645219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Longitudinal Study of Mammographic Density Measures That Predict Breast Cancer Risk.
    Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Stone J; Simpson JA; Severi G; Evans CF; MacInnis RJ; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Apr; 26(4):651-660. PubMed ID: 28062399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hormone replacement therapy, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
    Azam S; Lange T; Huynh S; Aro AR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Tjønneland A; Lynge E; Andersen ZJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2018 Jun; 29(6):495-505. PubMed ID: 29671181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast Cancer Risk Associations with Digital Mammographic Density by Pixel Brightness Threshold and Mammographic System.
    Nguyen TL; Choi YH; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh NH; Li S; Dite GS; Kim MS; Brennan PC; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Song YM; Hopper JL
    Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):433-442. PubMed ID: 29040039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme.
    Ward L; Heller S; Hudson S; Wilkinson L
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4717-4724. PubMed ID: 29808426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
    Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and evaluation of a method to assess breast cancer risk using a longitudinal history of mammographic density: a cohort study.
    Atakpa EC; Buist DSM; Aiello Bowles EJ; Cuzick J; Brentnall AR
    Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Nov; 25(1):147. PubMed ID: 38001476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
    Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.