360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29720565)
1. Implementation of a cardiac PET stress program: comparison of outcomes to the preceding SPECT era.
Knight S; Min DB; Le VT; Meredith KG; Dhar R; Biswas S; Jensen KR; Mason SM; Ethington JD; Lappe DL; Muhlestein JB; Anderson JL; Knowlton KU
JCI Insight; 2018 May; 3(9):. PubMed ID: 29720565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Pharmacologic SPECT and PET MPI in Symptomatic CAD Patients.
Patel KK; Al Badarin F; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Courter S; Kennedy KF; Case JA; McGhie AI; Heller GV; Bateman TM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Sep; 12(9):1821-1831. PubMed ID: 31326480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Compared With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging as a Guide to Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients Presenting With Stable Angina: The RESCUE Trial.
Stillman AE; Gatsonis C; Lima JAC; Liu T; Snyder BS; Cormack J; Malholtra V; Schnall MD; Udelson JE; Hoffmann U; Woodard PK;
J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Dec; 9(24):e017993. PubMed ID: 33283579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging with D-SPECT camera in patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA).
Liu L; Abdu FA; Yin G; Xu B; Mohammed AQ; Xu S; Lv X; Luo Y; Zu L; Yang C; Zhang Z; Zhou Y; Cai H; Lv Z; Xu Y; Che W
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):3025-3037. PubMed ID: 33000403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Value of Combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging versus Invasive Coronary Angiography and Nuclear Stress Perfusion Imaging in the Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: The CORE320 Multicenter Study.
Chen MY; Rochitte CE; Arbab-Zadeh A; Dewey M; George RT; Miller JM; Niinuma H; Yoshioka K; Kitagawa K; Sakuma H; Laham R; Vavere AL; Cerci RJ; Mehra VC; Nomura C; Kofoed KF; Jinzaki M; Kuribayashi S; Scholte AJ; Laule M; Tan SY; Hoe J; Paul N; Rybicki FJ; Brinker JA; Arai AE; Matheson MB; Cox C; Clouse ME; Di Carli MF; Lima JAC
Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 28290782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography With Selective PET Perfusion Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease.
Maaniitty T; Stenström I; Bax JJ; Uusitalo V; Ukkonen H; Kajander S; Mäki M; Saraste A; Knuuti J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1361-1370. PubMed ID: 28528146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absence of Coronary Artery Calcium During Positron Emission Tomography Stress Testing in Patients Without Known Coronary Artery Disease Identifies Individuals With Very Low Risk of Cardiac Events.
Le VT; Knight S; Min DB; McCubrey RO; Horne BD; Jensen KR; Meredith KG; Mason SM; Lappé DL; Anderson JL; Muhlestein JB; Knowlton KU
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 13(1):e009907. PubMed ID: 31959008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complete revascularization determined by myocardial perfusion imaging could improve the outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease, compared with incomplete revascularization and no revascularization.
Li J; Yang X; Tian Y; Wei H; Hacker M; Li X; Zhang X
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):944-953. PubMed ID: 29214612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diagnostic and prognostic value of near-normal perfusion or borderline ischemia on stress myocardial perfusion imaging.
Kassab K; Hussain K; Torres A; Iskander F; Iskander M; Khan R; Doukky R
J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 29(2):826-835. PubMed ID: 33034835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients presenting with syncope: Comparison of PET vs. SPECT.
Thomas M; Patel KK; Peri-Okonny P; Sperry BW; McGhie AI; Badarin FA; Saeed IM; Kennedy KF; Chan P; Spertus JA; Thompson RC; Bateman TM
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2895-2906. PubMed ID: 32405986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved Performance of PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to SPECT in the Evaluation of Suspected CAD.
Alam L; Omar AMS; Patel KK
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2023 Apr; 25(4):281-293. PubMed ID: 36826689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US.
Pelletier-Galarneau M; Vandenbroucke E; Lu M; Li O
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2023 May; 23(1):251. PubMed ID: 37189049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Addition to Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Symptomatic Patients.
Engbers EM; Timmer JR; Ottervanger JP; Mouden M; Knollema S; Jager PL
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 27165700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Effectiveness of PET and SPECT MPI for Predicting Cardiovascular Events After Kidney Transplant.
Huck DM; Weber B; Schreiber B; Pandav J; Parks S; Hainer J; Brown JM; Divakaran S; Blankstein R; Dorbala S; Trinquart L; Chandraker A; Di Carli MF
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jan; 17(1):e015858. PubMed ID: 38227694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography?
Yoshinaga K; Chow BJ; Williams K; Chen L; deKemp RA; Garrard L; Lok-Tin Szeto A; Aung M; Davies RA; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 48(5):1029-39. PubMed ID: 16949498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of SPECT and PET myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left bundle branch block or ventricular-paced rhythm.
Vidula MK; Wiener P; Selvaraj S; Khan MS; Salam UA; Rojulpote C; Metzler SD; Denduluri S; Guerraty M; Julien H; Bravo PE
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 28(3):981-988. PubMed ID: 33083984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of stress gated technetium-99m single photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for the prediction of cardiac death in patients with moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and suspected coronary artery disease.
Ahlberg AW; Kazi FA; Azemi T; Katten DM; O'Sullivan DM; Papaioannou GI; Danias PG; Heller GV
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jan; 109(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 21943938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of Hybrid Cardiac Imaging Methods for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Stand-Alone Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Meta-Analysis.
Rizvi A; Han D; Danad I; Ó Hartaigh B; Lee JH; Gransar H; Stuijfzand WJ; Roudsari HM; Park MW; Szymonifka J; Chang HJ; Jones EC; Knaapen P; Lin FY; Min JK; Peña JM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 11(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 28823745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term prognostic value of inducible and resting perfusion defects detected by single-photon emission computed tomography in the era of wide availability of coronary revascularization.
Filipiak-Strzecka D; Kowalczyk E; Hamala P; Kot N; Kasprzak JD; Kuśmierek J; Płachcińska A; Lipiec P
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2013 May; 33(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 23522016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in liver transplantation candidates.
Duvall WL; Singhvi A; Tripathi N; Henzlova MJ
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 27(1):254-265. PubMed ID: 30141170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
