These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29721773)
1. Prolonged Cecal Insertion Time Is Not Associated with Decreased Adenoma Detection When a Longer Withdrawal Time Is Achieved. Fritz CDL; Smith ZL; Elsner J; Hollander T; Early D; Kushnir V Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3120-3125. PubMed ID: 29721773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection. von Renteln D; Robertson DJ; Bensen S; Pohl H Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Mar; 85(3):574-580. PubMed ID: 27590962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Negative effect of prolonged cecal intubation time on adenoma detection in female patients. Hamada Y; Tanaka K; Horiki N; Tsuboi J; Yamada R; Nakamura M; Tamaru S; Yamada T; Nakagawa H JGH Open; 2023 Feb; 7(2):128-134. PubMed ID: 36852143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England. Lee TJ; Blanks RG; Rees CJ; Wright KC; Nickerson C; Moss SM; Chilton A; Goddard AF; Patnick J; McNally RJ; Rutter MD Endoscopy; 2013; 45(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23254403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A; Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate. Patel VD; Thompson WK; Lapin BR; Goldstein JL; Yen EF Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3084-3090. PubMed ID: 29974376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate. Buerger M; Kasper P; Allo G; Gillessen J; Schramm C BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):190. PubMed ID: 31730463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The association between cecal insertion time and colorectal neoplasm detection. Yang MH; Cho J; Rampal S; Choi EK; Choi YH; Lee JH; Kim YH; Chang DK; Rhee PL; Kim JJ; Guallar E; Rhee JC; Son HJ BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 13():124. PubMed ID: 23915303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study. Kushnir VM; Oh YS; Hollander T; Chen CH; Sayuk GS; Davidson N; Mullady D; Murad FM; Sharabash NM; Ruettgers E; Dassopoulos T; Easler JJ; Gyawali CP; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 110(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 25732415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Li A; Yang JZ; Yang XX; Feng BC; Zhang MM; Qu JY; Zhou RC; Wang P; Li LX; Zuo XL; Li YQ J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Dec; 35(12):2066-2073. PubMed ID: 32562282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy. Hafner S; Zolk K; Radaelli F; Otte J; Rabenstein T; Zolk O Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 May; 2015(5):CD009863. PubMed ID: 26011829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome. Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Finding Cecal Adenoma Increase the Risk of Discovering More and Advanced Adenomas in the Remainder of the Colon? Nadeem M; Parava M P; Bitar H; Hanafi M; Mahmood S; Saleem R; Madhoun MF South Med J; 2022 Sep; 115(9):693-697. PubMed ID: 36055657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit. Benson ME; Reichelderfer M; Said A; Gaumnitz EA; Pfau PR Dig Dis Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 19156519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]