301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29721845)
1. Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.
Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1271-1301. PubMed ID: 29721845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.
Marusic A; Wager E; Utrobicic A; Rothstein HR; Sambunjak D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Apr; 4(4):MR000038. PubMed ID: 27040721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Researchers' interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study.
Shaw D; Satalkar P
Account Res; 2018; 25(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 29291621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.
Okonta PI; Rossouw T
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():25. PubMed ID: 24666413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior.
Holm S; Hofmann B
Account Res; 2018; 25(5):290-300. PubMed ID: 29874932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.
Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1755-1776. PubMed ID: 29249021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.
Godecharle S; Fieuws S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1697-1717. PubMed ID: 28971354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers' reflections on reporting misconduct.
Satalkar P; Shaw D
Account Res; 2018; 25(6):311-339. PubMed ID: 29954230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals.
Yu L; Miao M; Liu W; Zhang B; Zhang P
Account Res; 2021 Feb; 28(2):95-114. PubMed ID: 32783533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.
Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Researchers experience of misconduct in research in Malaysian higher education institutions.
Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
Account Res; 2018; 25(3):125-141. PubMed ID: 29394103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Publication misconduct: Perceptions of participants of a faculty development programme.
Singh SP; Dhir SK; Sharma M; Singh T
Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 31044767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers.
Palla IA; Singson M
Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(8):707-724. PubMed ID: 35584318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Witnesses to research wrongdoing.
Sieber JE
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Dec; 7(5):3-14. PubMed ID: 23324198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.
Okonta P; Rossouw T
Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 22994914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.
Fanelli D; Costas R; Larivière V
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127556. PubMed ID: 26083381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Research integrity in greater China: surveying regulations, perceptions and knowledge of research integrity from a Hong Kong perspective.
Jordan SR; Gray PW
Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):125-37. PubMed ID: 22994886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
