BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29722125)

  • 1. Sample size determination and treatment screening in two-stage phase II clinical trials via ROC curve.
    Huang WS; Chang YI
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):504-514. PubMed ID: 29722125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A flexible multi-stage design for phase II oncology trials.
    Tan MT; Xiong X
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 22328328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
    Chen K; Shan M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 2-in-1 adaptive phase 2/3 design for expedited oncology drug development.
    Chen C; Anderson K; Mehrotra DV; Rubin EH; Tse A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2018 Jan; 64():238-242. PubMed ID: 28966137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new adaptive design based on Simon's two-stage optimal design for phase II clinical trials.
    Jin H; Wei Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Nov; 33(6):1255-60. PubMed ID: 22772088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive two-stage designs in phase II clinical trials.
    Banerjee A; Tsiatis AA
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3382-95. PubMed ID: 16479547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An adaptive design to bridge the gap between Phase 2b/3 microbicide effectiveness trials and evidence required for licensure.
    Taylor DJ; Grobler A; Abdool Karim SS
    Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 22610168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Curtailed two-stage designs with two dependent binary endpoints.
    Chen CM; Chi Y
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 22162348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal planning of phase II/III programs for clinical trials with multiple endpoints.
    Kieser M; Kirchner M; Dölger E; Götte H
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):437-457. PubMed ID: 29700949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive designs for single-arm phase II trials in oncology.
    Englert S; Kieser M
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 22411839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-stage phase II oncology designs using short-term endpoints for early stopping.
    Kunz CU; Wason JM; Kieser M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1671-1683. PubMed ID: 26037529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal two-stage randomized phase II clinical trials.
    Logan BR
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 16279574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible designs for phase II comparative clinical trials involving two response variables.
    Bersimis S; Sachlas A; Papaioannou T
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 25274584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal adaptive two-stage designs for early phase II clinical trials.
    Shan G; Wilding GE; Hutson AD; Gerstenberger S
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(8):1257-66. PubMed ID: 26526165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical challenges in assessing potential efficacy of complex interventions in pilot or feasibility studies.
    Wilson DT; Walwyn RE; Brown J; Farrin AJ; Brown SR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Jun; 25(3):997-1009. PubMed ID: 26071430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stochastically curtailed phase II clinical trials.
    Ayanlowo AO; Redden DT
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1462-72. PubMed ID: 16900560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.
    Brannath W; Bauer P
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 15339294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Graphical search for two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Carey M; Kim KM
    Control Clin Trials; 2001 Aug; 22(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 11514038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size adjustment based on promising interim results and its application in confirmatory clinical trials.
    Chen YH; Li C; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2015 Dec; 12(6):584-95. PubMed ID: 26195615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exact two-stage designs for phase II activity trials with rank-based endpoints.
    Wilding GE; Shan G; Hutson AD
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Mar; 33(2):332-41. PubMed ID: 22074983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.