These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29722543)

  • 1. Effective dose reduction using collimation function in digital panoramic radiography and possible clinical implications in dentistry.
    Benchimol D; Koivisto J; Kadesjö N; Shi XQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Oct; 47(7):20180007. PubMed ID: 29722543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
    Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24174012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.
    Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shielding effect of thyroid collar for digital panoramic radiography.
    Han GS; Cheng JG; Li G; Ma XC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130265. PubMed ID: 24005060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dose exposure from analog and digital full mouth radiography and panoramic radiography].
    Kiefer H; Lambrecht JT; Roth J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2004; 114(7):687-93. PubMed ID: 15360104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does dose optimisation in digital panoramic radiography affect diagnostic performance?
    Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Forner LA; Viccari C; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Feb; 25(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 32845471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetry analysis of panoramic-imaging devices in different-sized phantoms.
    Wahid MA; Choi E; MacDonald DS; Ford NL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 28300383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Wyatt J; Van Dam J; Nowak B; Jacobs R
    Br Dent J; 2004 Aug; 197(3):149-52; discussion 140. PubMed ID: 15311250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.
    Dula K; Sanderink G; van der Stelt PF; Mini R; Buser D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 9720100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collimation and Image Quality of C-Arm Computed Tomography: Potential of Radiation Dose Reduction While Maintaining Equal Image Quality.
    Werncke T; von Falck C; Luepke M; Stamm G; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):514-21. PubMed ID: 25867655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated measurement for image distortion analysis in 2D panoramic imaging of dental CBCT system: A phantom study.
    Rabba JA; Suhaimi FM; Mat Jafri MZ; Jaafar HA; Osman ND
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):533-538. PubMed ID: 36913788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reduction of dose in paediatric panoramic radiography: the impact of collimator height and programme selection.
    Davis AT; Safi H; Maddison SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(2):20140223. PubMed ID: 25352427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.