These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29722937)

  • 1. A Novel Methodology to Validate the Accuracy of Extraoral Dental Scanners and Digital Articulation Systems.
    Ellakwa A; Elnajar S; Littlefair D; Sara G
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 May; 26(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 29722937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.
    Güth JF; Runkel C; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Keul C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 27406138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intraoral and extraoral scanners on the accuracy of digital model articulation.
    Porter JL; Carrico CK; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E
    J Orthod; 2018 Dec; 45(4):275-282. PubMed ID: 30024348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Rydén J; Thor A
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():110-118. PubMed ID: 29246490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative study of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry].
    Kostiukova VV; Riakhovskiĭ AN; Ukhanov MM
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2014; 93(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 24719970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality.
    Birnbaum NS; Aaronson HB
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):494, 496, 498-505. PubMed ID: 18935788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners.
    Flügge TV; Att W; Metzger MC; Nelson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 27148990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro assessment of the accuracy of digital impressions prepared using a single system for full-arch restorations on implants.
    Ciocca L; Meneghello R; Monaco C; Savio G; Scheda L; Gatto MR; Baldissara P
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Jul; 13(7):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 29500759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro.
    Güth JF; Edelhoff D; Schweiger J; Keul C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 26454734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Dimensional Static Articulation Accuracy of Virtual Models-Part II: Effect of Model Scanner-CAD Systems and Articulation Method.
    Yee SHX; Esguerra RJ; Chew AAQ; Wong KM; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):137-144. PubMed ID: 29210502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained from Intraoral and Extraoral Dental Scanners with Different CAD/CAM Scanning Technologies: An In Vitro Study.
    Ellakany P; Tantawi ME; Mahrous AA; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):314-319. PubMed ID: 34085355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems].
    Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 27636766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
    Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data.
    Chen Z; Li Y; Deng X; Wang X
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24118182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters.
    Giménez B; Pradíes G; Martínez-Rus F; Özcan M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 25615916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses.
    Takeuchi Y; Koizumi H; Furuchi M; Sato Y; Ohkubo C; Matsumura H
    J Oral Sci; 2018; 60(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29576569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.