These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29722937)

  • 41. Quantitative evaluation of common errors in digital impression obtained by using an LED blue light in-office CAD/CAM system.
    Kim JH; Kim KB; Kim SH; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    Quintessence Int; 2015 May; 46(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 25699295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation.
    Pesce P; Pera F; Setti P; Menini M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):171-175. PubMed ID: 29518813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral and extraoral scanners: an in vitro study using a new method of evaluation.
    Muallah J; Wesemann C; Nowak R; Robben J; Mah J; Pospiech P; Bumann A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(2):151-164. PubMed ID: 28630956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [CAD/CAM technology-elaboration of electronic model through optical impression in the fabrication of the dental prostheses by a computer assisted device].
    Neumann CP; Tatarciuc MS; Viţalariu A; Diaconu D; Luca O
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2000; 104(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 12089985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Abdel-Azim T; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The accuracy of the CAD system using intraoral and extraoral scanners for designing of fixed dental prostheses.
    Shimizu S; Shinya A; Kuroda S; Gomi H
    Dent Mater J; 2017 Jul; 36(4):402-407. PubMed ID: 28302948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study.
    Hassan B; Gimenez Gonzalez B; Tahmaseb A; Greven M; Wismeijer D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 27881321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit.
    Papaspyridakos P; Hirayama H; Chen CJ; Ho CH; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26374268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accuracy and Precision Evaluation of International Standard Spherical Model by Digital Dental Scanners.
    Cai HX; Jia Q; Shi H; Jiang Y; Xue J; Chen C; Gong H; Liu J; Lee ES; Jiang HB
    Scanning; 2020; 2020():1714642. PubMed ID: 33500743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of two intraoral scanners based on three-dimensional surface analysis.
    Lee KM
    Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 29430612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Digital casts in orthodontics: a comparison of 4 software systems.
    Westerlund A; Tancredi W; Ransjö M; Bresin A; Psonis S; Torgersson O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25836011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Optical impression method to measure three-dimensional position and orientation of dental implants using an optical tracker.
    Ono S; Yamaguchi S; Kusumoto N; Nakano T; Sohmura T; Yatani H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1117-22. PubMed ID: 22712431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
    Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Digital Implant Impression Technique Accuracy: A Systematic Review.
    Alikhasi M; Alsharbaty MHM; Moharrami M
    Implant Dent; 2017 Dec; 26(6):929-935. PubMed ID: 29095786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Intraoral Digital Impressioning for Dental Implant Restorations Versus Traditional Implant Impression Techniques.
    Wilk BL
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015; 36(7):529-30, 532-3. PubMed ID: 26247446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT.
    Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners.
    Maeng J; Lim YJ; Kim B; Kim MJ; Kwon HB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 30897832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An in-vitro study comparing the accuracy of ?full-arch casts digitized with desktop scanners.
    Nowak R; Wesemann C; Robben J; Muallah J; Bumann A
    Quintessence Int; 2017 Jul; ():667-676. PubMed ID: 28740969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.