These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29723065)

  • 1. Why We Need a Formal Systematic Approach to Validating Psychological Tests: The Case of the Rorschach Comprehensive System.
    Mihura JL; Bombel G; Dumitrascu N; Roy M; Meadows EA
    J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(4):374-392. PubMed ID: 29723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) Psychometric Validity of Individual Variables.
    Tibon Czopp S; Zeligman R
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 27153465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A second look at the validity of widely used Rorschach indices: comment on Mihura, Meyer, Dumitrascu, and Bombel (2013).
    Wood JM; Garb HN; Nezworski MT; Lilienfeld SO; Duke MC
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 141(1):236-49. PubMed ID: 25581287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Centrality of the Response Process in Construct Validity: An Illustration via the Rorschach Space Response.
    Mihura JL; Dumitrascu N; Roy M; Meyer GJ
    J Pers Assess; 2018; 100(3):233-249. PubMed ID: 28448159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial validity of the Logical Rorschach in the assessment of trauma.
    Smith SR; Chang J; Kochinski S; Patz S; Nowinski LA
    J Pers Assess; 2010 May; 92(3):222-31. PubMed ID: 20408022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using the Rorschach properly in practice and research.
    Weiner IB
    J Clin Psychol; 2000 Mar; 56(3):435-8; discussion 441-8. PubMed ID: 10726676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of alexithymia with the Rorschach Comprehensive System: the Rorschach Alexithymia Scale (RAS).
    Porcelli P; Mihura JL
    J Pers Assess; 2010 Mar; 92(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20155562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) "The scientific status of projective techniques".
    Hibbard S
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Jun; 80(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 12763700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal stability in the Rorschach method: a meta-analytic review.
    Gronnerod C
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Jun; 80(3):272-93. PubMed ID: 12763701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contemporary Data on the Location of Response Objects in Rorschach's Inkblots.
    Berry BA; Meyer GJ
    J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(4):402-413. PubMed ID: 29319355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of CS Administration or an R-Optimized Alternative on R-PAS Variables: A Meta-Analysis of Findings From Six Studies.
    Hosseininasab A; Meyer GJ; Viglione DJ; Mihura JL; Berant E; Resende AC; Reese J; Mohammadi MR
    J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 29210594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity of individual Rorschach variables: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system.
    Mihura JL; Meyer GJ; Dumitrascu N; Bombel G
    Psychol Bull; 2013 May; 139(3):548-605. PubMed ID: 22925137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weighing evidence for the Rorschach's validity: a response to Wood et al. (1999).
    Ganellen RJ
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Aug; 77(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 11562095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introducing a Bayesian Approach to Determining Degree of Fit With Existing Rorschach Norms.
    Giromini L; Viglione DJ; McCullaugh J
    J Pers Assess; 2015; 97(4):354-63. PubMed ID: 25257792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effects of Using the International Versus Comprehensive System Rorschach Norms For Children, Adolescents, and Adults.
    Viglione DJ; Giromini L
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 26829463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rorschach scores in applied clinical practice: a survey of perceived validity by experienced clinicians.
    Meyer GJ; Hsiao WC; Viglione DJ; Mihura JL; Abraham LM
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(4):351-65. PubMed ID: 23452352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Rorschach Inkblot Test: a case of overstatement?
    Wood JM; Lilienfeld SO
    Assessment; 1999 Dec; 6(4):341-52. PubMed ID: 10539981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-Cultural Validation of the Rorschach Developmental Index.
    Giromini L; Viglione DJ; Brusadelli E; Lang M; Reese JB; Zennaro A
    J Pers Assess; 2015; 97(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 25297675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coming to grips with negative evidence for the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: a comment on Gacono, Loving, and Bodholdt; Ganellen; and Bornstein.
    Wood JM; Lilienfeld SO; Nezworski MT; Garb HN
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Aug; 77(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 11562104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Rorschach test in clinical diagnosis: a critical review, with a backward look at Garfield (1947).
    Wood JM; Lilienfeld SO; Garb HN; Nezworski MT
    J Clin Psychol; 2000 Mar; 56(3):395-430; discussion 431-4. PubMed ID: 10726675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.