These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29723114)

  • 21. Sources of interference in recognition testing.
    Annis J; Malmberg KJ; Criss AH; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1365-76. PubMed ID: 23565778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Testing enhances subsequent learning in older adults.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KT
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 30335442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reduced interference from memory testing: A postretrieval monitoring account.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA; McCain JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1063-1072. PubMed ID: 28114777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Initial category cues and recognition memory foils for the Cognistat Verbal Memory alternate word list.
    Brzezinski SB; Fouty HE; Rennells MJ; Gatto MS; Kamps CL; Crespin LM
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2012; 19(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 23373601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Age-related changes in frequency of mind-wandering and task-related interferences during memory encoding and their impact on retrieval.
    Maillet D; Rajah MN
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):818-31. PubMed ID: 23360550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
    Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selective attention meets spontaneous recognition memory: Evidence for effects at retrieval.
    Moen KC; Miller JK; Lloyd ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():181-189. PubMed ID: 28214768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Guessing versus misremembering in recognition: A comparison of continuous, two-high-threshold, and low-threshold models.
    Starns JJ; Ma Q
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):527-539. PubMed ID: 28933897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of Isometric Hand-Grip Muscle Contraction on Young Adults' Free Recall and Recognition Memory.
    Tomporowski PD; Albrecht C; Pendleton DM
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2017 Mar; 88(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 28151087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of intentional versus incidental retrieval practices on the role of recollection in test-enhanced learning.
    Pu X; Tse CS
    Cogn Process; 2014 Feb; 15(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 24096993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.
    Abel M; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 27464491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Item-method directed forgetting: Effects at retrieval?
    Taylor TL; Cutmore L; Pries L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():116-123. PubMed ID: 29275948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The neural correlates of recollection and retrieval monitoring: Relationships with age and recollection performance.
    de Chastelaine M; Mattson JT; Wang TH; Donley BE; Rugg MD
    Neuroimage; 2016 Sep; 138():164-175. PubMed ID: 27155127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retrieval-induced forgetting in a category recognition task.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):286-91. PubMed ID: 19210100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Test expectancy and memory for important information.
    Middlebrooks CD; Murayama K; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jun; 43(6):972-985. PubMed ID: 28095010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Further evidence for functional differences between guessing versus choosing an upcoming task.
    Kleinsorge T; Scheil J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():1-9. PubMed ID: 29287207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decomposing item-method directed forgetting of emotional pictures: Equivalent costs and no benefits.
    Taylor TL; Quinlan CK; Vullings KCH
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):132-147. PubMed ID: 29214552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.