These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29723217)

  • 21. Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.
    Teresi JA; Wang C; Kleinman M; Jones RN; Weiss DJ
    Psychometrika; 2021 Sep; 86(3):674-711. PubMed ID: 34251615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing.
    Haley SM; Ni P; Dumas HM; Fragala-Pinkham MA; Hambleton RK; Montpetit K; Bilodeau N; Gorton GE; Watson K; Tucker CA
    Qual Life Res; 2009 Apr; 18(3):359-70. PubMed ID: 19221892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data.
    Sijtsma K; van der Ark LA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):137-158. PubMed ID: 27958642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A mixture model for responses and response times with a higher-order ability structure to detect rapid guessing behaviour.
    Lu J; Wang C; Zhang J; Tao J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):261-288. PubMed ID: 31385609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement.
    Adams DJ; Bolt DM; Deng S; Smith SS; Baker TB
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):466-485. PubMed ID: 30919943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fitting the factor analysis model in lI norm.
    Trendafilov NT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):19-31. PubMed ID: 15969836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simulation-based Bayesian inference for latent traits of item response models: Introduction to the ltbayes package for R.
    Johnson TR; Kuhn KM
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1309-1327. PubMed ID: 25427954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF; Zheng Y; Henson R
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1069-1092. PubMed ID: 27734298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
    Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Confirmatory Multidimensional IRT Unfolding Models for Graded-Response Items.
    Wang WC; Wu SL
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Jan; 40(1):56-72. PubMed ID: 29881036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methods of utilizing baseline values for indirect response models.
    Woo S; Pawaskar D; Jusko WJ
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2009 Oct; 36(5):381-405. PubMed ID: 19697107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robust model fitting for the non linear structural equation model under normal theory.
    Xia YM; Song XY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):529-68. PubMed ID: 19040790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Limited information estimation of the diffusion-based item response theory model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):122-38. PubMed ID: 26853083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An improved CML estimation procedure for the Rasch model with item response data.
    Sheng X; Carrière KC
    Stat Med; 2002 Feb; 21(3):407-16. PubMed ID: 11813227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On Latent Trait Estimation in Multidimensional Compensatory Item Response Models.
    Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):428-49. PubMed ID: 24604245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Scale Anchoring with the Rasch Model.
    Wyse AE
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 28453498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accelerating L1-penalized expectation maximization algorithm for latent variable selection in multidimensional two-parameter logistic models.
    Shang L; Xu PF; Shan N; Tang ML; Ho GT
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0279918. PubMed ID: 36649269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Generalized Speed-Accuracy Response Model for Dichotomous Items.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):109-131. PubMed ID: 29164449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.