These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29723427)

  • 1. A Robust Approach to Risk Assessment Based on Species Sensitivity Distributions.
    Monti GS; Filzmoser P; Deutsch RC
    Risk Anal; 2018 Oct; 38(10):2073-2086. PubMed ID: 29723427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Better bootstrap estimation of hazardous concentration thresholds for aquatic assemblages.
    Grist EP; Leung KM; Wheeler JR; Crane M
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Jul; 21(7):1515-24. PubMed ID: 12109754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic Consideration of Parameter Uncertainty and Variability in Probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions.
    Wigger H; Kawecki D; Nowack B; Adam V
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):211-222. PubMed ID: 31535755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competing statistical methods for the fitting of normal species sensitivity distributions: recommendations for practitioners.
    Hickey GL; Craig PS
    Risk Anal; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1232-43. PubMed ID: 22050459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical approaches to estimating mean water quality concentrations with detection limits.
    Shumway RH; Azari RS; Kayhanian M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Aug; 36(15):3345-53. PubMed ID: 12188364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
    Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MOSAIC_SSD: a new web tool for species sensitivity distribution to include censored data by maximum likelihood.
    Kon Kam King G; Veber P; Charles S; Delignette-Muller ML
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Sep; 33(9):2133-9. PubMed ID: 24863265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ecological hazard assessment via species sensitivity distributions: The non-exchangeability issue.
    Migliorati S; Monti GS; Vighi M
    Biom J; 2021 Apr; 63(4):875-892. PubMed ID: 33491802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Setting water quality criteria in China: approaches for developing species sensitivity distributions for metals and metalloids.
    Liu Y; Wu F; Mu Y; Feng C; Fang Y; Chen L; Giesy JP
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 230():35-57. PubMed ID: 24609517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limitations of current risk characterization methods in probabilistic environmental risk assessment.
    Verdonck FA; Aldenberg T; Jaworska J; Vanrolleghem PA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Sep; 22(9):2209-13. PubMed ID: 12959553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "AMORE" Decision Support System for probabilistic Ecological Risk Assessment - Part II: Effect assessment of the case study on cyanide.
    Isigonis P; Critto A; Zabeo A; Ciffroy P
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 648():1665-1672. PubMed ID: 30172483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical mirroring: A robust method for statistical dispersion estimation.
    Abdullahi KB
    MethodsX; 2024 Jun; 12():102682. PubMed ID: 38707212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A probabilistic method for species sensitivity distributions taking into account the inherent uncertainty and variability of effects to estimate environmental risk.
    Gottschalk F; Nowack B
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22745057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical and parametric likelihood interval estimation for populations with many zero values: application for assessing environmental chemical concentrations and reproductive health.
    Kang L; Vexler A; Tian L; Cooney M; Louis GM
    Epidemiology; 2010 Jul; 21 Suppl 4():S58-63. PubMed ID: 21422967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
    Fox DR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robust nonlinear regression in applications.
    Lim C; Sen PK; Peddada SD
    J Indian Soc Agric Stat; 2013; 67(2):215-234. PubMed ID: 25580021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
    Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bootstrap Approach To Compare the Slopes of Two Calibrations When Few Standards Are Available.
    Estévez-Pérez G; Andrade JM; Wilcox RR
    Anal Chem; 2016 Feb; 88(4):2289-95. PubMed ID: 26751504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.