These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

715 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29723555)

  • 41. Dynamic crossmodal links revealed by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention.
    de Jong R; Toffanin P; Harbers M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jan; 75(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 19819271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes.
    Escera C; Corral MJ; Yago E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 12421656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Existence of competing modality dominances.
    Robinson CW; Chandra M; Sinnett S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1104-14. PubMed ID: 26832916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants.
    Mifsud NG; Oestreich LK; Jack BN; Ford JM; Roach BJ; Mathalon DH; Whitford TJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 26751981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Intra-modal and cross-modal spatial attention to auditory and visual stimuli. An event-related brain potential study.
    Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Münte TF; Sperlich F; Hillyard SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Oct; 8(3):327-43. PubMed ID: 10556609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Preventing distraction: assessing stimulus-specific and general effects of the predictive cueing of deviant auditory events.
    Horváth J; Sussman E; Winkler I; Schröger E
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Apr; 87(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 21310210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Event-related potentials and audiovisual stimuli: multimodal interactions.
    Czigler I; Balázs L
    Neuroreport; 2001 Feb; 12(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 11209924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Event-related potentials during auditory oddball, and combined auditory oddball-visual paradigms.
    Işoğlu-alkaç U; Kedzior K; Karamürsel S; Ermutlu N
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 117(4):487-506. PubMed ID: 17380607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Facilitation of responses by task-irrelevant complex deviant stimuli.
    Schomaker J; Meeter M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():74-80. PubMed ID: 24486809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Coupling between Theta Oscillations and Cognitive Control Network during Cross-Modal Visual and Auditory Attention: Supramodal vs Modality-Specific Mechanisms.
    Wang W; Viswanathan S; Lee T; Grafton ST
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158465. PubMed ID: 27391013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Attentional rather than sensory differences characterize auditory processing in Williams syndrome.
    Jacobs M; Dykens EM; Key AP
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Mar; 121():24-37. PubMed ID: 29353707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli.
    Woods DL; Alho K; Algazi A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 May; 82(5):341-55. PubMed ID: 1374703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.