465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29723588)
1. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.
Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.
Azer SA; AlOlayan TI; AlGhamdi MA; AlSanea MA
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 23(9):1676-1696. PubMed ID: 28321169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient.
Plambeck B; Jiang J; Perez J; Wordekemper BE; Fu D; Colvin A; Deibert CM
Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e34240. PubMed ID: 36852349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.
Joury AU; Alshathri M; Alkhunaizi M; Jaleesah N; Pines JM
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1146-1152. PubMed ID: 27341392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of Internet information related to the Mediterranean diet.
Hirasawa R; Saito K; Yachi Y; Ibe Y; Kodama S; Asumi M; Horikawa C; Saito A; Heianza Y; Kondo K; Shimano H; Sone H
Public Health Nutr; 2012 May; 15(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 21923978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of web-based information on inflammatory bowel diseases.
van der Marel S; Duijvestein M; Hardwick JC; van den Brink GR; Veenendaal R; Hommes DW; Fidder HH
Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2009 Dec; 15(12):1891-6. PubMed ID: 19462423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer.
Garfinkle R; Wong-Chong N; Petrucci A; Sylla P; Wexner SD; Bhatnagar S; Morin N; Boutros M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 30609222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
