These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29723650)

  • 1. Calcaneus range of motion underestimated by markers on running shoe heel.
    Alcantara RS; Trudeau MB; Rohr ES
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():68-72. PubMed ID: 29723650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of shoe sole construction on skeletal motion during running.
    Stacoff A; Reinschmidt C; Nigg BM; Van Den Bogert AJ; Lundberg A; Denoth J; Stüssi E
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Feb; 33(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 11224823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tibiocalcaneal kinematics of barefoot versus shod running.
    Stacoff A; Nigg BM; Reinschmidt C; van den Bogert AJ; Lundberg A
    J Biomech; 2000 Nov; 33(11):1387-95. PubMed ID: 10940397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of footwear and foot orthoses on transverse plane knee motion during running - A pilot study.
    Hutchison L; Scharfbillig R; Uden H; Bishop C
    J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Nov; 18(6):748-52. PubMed ID: 25543977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Movement coupling at the ankle during the stance phase of running.
    Stacoff A; Nigg BM; Reinschmidt C; van den Bogert AJ; Lundberg A; Stüssi E; Denoth J
    Foot Ankle Int; 2000 Mar; 21(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 10739155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running.
    Stacoff A; Reinschmidt C; Nigg BM; van den Bogert AJ; Lundberg A; Denoth J; Stüssi E
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2000 Jan; 15(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 10590345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in running kinematics and kinetics in response to a rockered shoe intervention.
    Boyer KA; Andriacchi TP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Dec; 24(10):872-6. PubMed ID: 19744753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unholey shoes: Experimental considerations when estimating ankle joint complex power during walking and running.
    McDonald KA; Honert EC; Cook OS; Zelik KE
    J Biomech; 2019 Jul; 92():61-66. PubMed ID: 31164225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Evaluation of Radiographic Parameters of Foot Pronation in Two Different Conditions versus Barefoot.
    Anselmo DS; Skolnik J; Keeter E; El-Sayed AM; Love E
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2018 Jul; 108(4):285-291. PubMed ID: 30156892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of shoe heel height on ankle dynamics in running.
    Yawar A; Lieberman DE
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):17959. PubMed ID: 39095422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of heel design on lower extremity biomechanics and comfort perception in overground running.
    Liu ZL; Lam WK; Zhang X; Vanwanseele B; Liu H
    J Sports Sci; 2021 Jan; 39(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 32881635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adolescent runners: the effect of training shoes on running kinematics.
    Mullen S; Toby EB
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Jun; 33(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 23653037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical implications of the negative heel rocker sole shoe: gait kinematics and kinetics.
    Myers KA; Long JT; Klein JP; Wertsch JJ; Janisse D; Harris GF
    Gait Posture; 2006 Nov; 24(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 16300949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of a multi-segment foot model in a neutral cushioning shoe during treadmill walking.
    Balsdon MER; Dombroski CE
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():60. PubMed ID: 30473733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acute effect of different minimalist shoes on foot strike pattern and kinematics in rearfoot strikers during running.
    Squadrone R; Rodano R; Hamill J; Preatoni E
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(11):1196-204. PubMed ID: 25529114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes.
    Willy RW; Davis IS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Feb; 46(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 23877378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of motion control running shoes compared with neutral shoes on tibial rotation during running.
    Rose A; Birch I; Kuisma R
    Physiotherapy; 2011 Sep; 97(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 21820544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics.
    Butler RJ; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 16902231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Joint coordination when running in minimalist, neutral, and ultra-cushioning shoes.
    Borgia B; Freedman Silvernail J; Becker J
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Apr; 38(8):855-862. PubMed ID: 32167013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.