441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29723652)
1. Kinetic differences between level walking and ramp descent in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation using a prosthetic knee without a stance control mechanism.
Okita Y; Yamasaki N; Nakamura T; Kubo T; Mitsumoto A; Akune T
Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():80-85. PubMed ID: 29723652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-individual biomechanical effects of a non-microprocessor-controlled stance-yielding prosthetic knee during ramp descent in persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation.
Okita Y; Yamasaki N; Nakamura T; Mita T; Kubo T; Mitsumoto A; Akune T
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 30051754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.
Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T; Kannenberg A; Bellmann M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 35090505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical responses of young adults with unilateral transfemoral amputation using two types of mechanical stance control prosthetic knee joints.
Andrysek J; García D; Rozbaczylo C; Alvarez-Mitchell C; Valdebenito R; Rotter K; Wright FV
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Oct; 44(5):314-322. PubMed ID: 32389076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absent loading response knee flexion: The impact on gait kinetics and centre of mass motion in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation, and the effect of microprocessor controlled knee provision.
Carse B; Hebenton J; Brady L; Davie-Smith F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Aug; 108():106061. PubMed ID: 37556922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A characterisation of established unilateral transfemoral amputee gait using 3D kinematics, kinetics and oxygen consumption measures.
Carse B; Scott H; Brady L; Colvin J
Gait Posture; 2020 Jan; 75():98-104. PubMed ID: 31645007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-Slope and Level Walking Strategies During Swing in Individuals With Lower Limb Amputation.
Villa C; Loiret I; Langlois K; Bonnet X; Lavaste F; Fodé P; Pillet H
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 98(6):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 27832952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on ramp negotiation and community walking function in K2 level transfemoral amputees.
Burnfield JM; Eberly VJ; Gronely JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Mulroy SJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 22223685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking.
Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knee adduction moment peak and impulse do not change during the first six months of walking with a prosthesis.
Krupenevich RL; Miller RH; Hendershot BD; Schnall BL; Pruziner AL
Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():86-90. PubMed ID: 29727776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using C-Leg and Power Knee for ascending and descending inclines and steps.
Wolf EJ; Everding VQ; Linberg AL; Schnall BL; Czerniecki JM; Gambel JM
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(6):831-42. PubMed ID: 23299255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
Eberly VJ; Mulroy SJ; Gronley JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Burnfield JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 24135259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors associated with a risk of prosthetic knee buckling during walking in unilateral transfemoral amputees.
Hisano G; Hashizume S; Kobayashi Y; Murai A; Kobayashi T; Nakashima M; Hobara H
Gait Posture; 2020 Mar; 77():69-74. PubMed ID: 31999980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of prosthetic alignment on gait and biomechanical loading in individuals with transfemoral amputation: A preliminary study.
Zhang T; Bai X; Liu F; Fan Y
Gait Posture; 2019 Jun; 71():219-226. PubMed ID: 31078826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transfemoral amputee intact limb loading and compensatory gait mechanics during down slope ambulation and the effect of prosthetic knee mechanisms.
Morgenroth DC; Roland M; Pruziner AL; Czerniecki JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jun; 55():65-72. PubMed ID: 29698851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The biomechanical response of persons with transfemoral amputation to variations in prosthetic knee alignment during level walking.
Koehler-McNicholas SR; Lipschutz RD; Gard SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(6):1089-1106. PubMed ID: 28355034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate effects of a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint: a comparative biomechanical evaluation.
Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Ludwigs E; Blumentritt S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 93(3):541-9. PubMed ID: 22373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gait termination on a declined surface in trans-femoral amputees: Impact of using microprocessor-controlled limb system.
Abdulhasan ZM; Scally AJ; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():35-41. PubMed ID: 29908391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
