442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29723697)
1. An exploratory radiomics analysis on digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts.
Tagliafico AS; Valdora F; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Houssami N; Calabrese M
Breast; 2018 Aug; 40():92-96. PubMed ID: 29723697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biologic Profiles of Invasive Breast Cancers Detected Only With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Kim JY; Kang HJ; Shin JK; Lee NK; Song YS; Nam KJ; Choo KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1411-1418. PubMed ID: 28834445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of breast cancer presenting as a mass in women with dense breasts - digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.
Babkina TM; Dykan IM; Gurando AV; Suleimenova DM; Kozarenko TM; Bozhok YM; Stuley VA
Exp Oncol; 2020 Sep; 42(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 32996743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid review: Estimates of incremental breast cancer detection from tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening in women with dense breasts.
Houssami N; Turner RM
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():141-145. PubMed ID: 27721194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adjunct Screening With Tomosynthesis or Ultrasound in Women With Mammography-Negative Dense Breasts: Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Trial.
Tagliafico AS; Calabrese M; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Tosto S; Monetti F; Airaldi S; Bignotti B; Nori J; Bagni A; Signori A; Sormani MP; Houssami N
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(16):1882-1888. PubMed ID: 26962097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement between digital breast tomosynthesis and pathologic tumour size for staging breast cancer, and comparison with standard mammography.
Marinovich ML; Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Ventriglia A; Sabatino V; Houssami N
Breast; 2019 Feb; 43():59-66. PubMed ID: 30466027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reading time for six strategies using digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts.
Tagliafico AS; Calabrese M; Bignotti B; Signori A; Fisci E; Rossi F; Valdora F; Houssami N
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5179-5184. PubMed ID: 28643094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of Additional Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Preoperative Staging of Breast Cancer in Dense Breasts.
Krammer J; Stepniewski K; Kaiser CG; Brade J; Riffel P; Schoenberg SO; Wasser K
Anticancer Res; 2017 Sep; 37(9):5255-5261. PubMed ID: 28870962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening?
Starikov A; Drotman M; Hentel K; Katzen J; Min RJ; Arleo EK
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26549432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
