These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29723697)

  • 1. An exploratory radiomics analysis on digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts.
    Tagliafico AS; Valdora F; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Houssami N; Calabrese M
    Breast; 2018 Aug; 40():92-96. PubMed ID: 29723697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
    Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biologic Profiles of Invasive Breast Cancers Detected Only With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Kim JY; Kang HJ; Shin JK; Lee NK; Song YS; Nam KJ; Choo KS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1411-1418. PubMed ID: 28834445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K
    Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of breast cancer presenting as a mass in women with dense breasts - digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.
    Babkina TM; Dykan IM; Gurando AV; Suleimenova DM; Kozarenko TM; Bozhok YM; Stuley VA
    Exp Oncol; 2020 Sep; 42(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 32996743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid review: Estimates of incremental breast cancer detection from tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening in women with dense breasts.
    Houssami N; Turner RM
    Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():141-145. PubMed ID: 27721194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
    Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjunct Screening With Tomosynthesis or Ultrasound in Women With Mammography-Negative Dense Breasts: Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Trial.
    Tagliafico AS; Calabrese M; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Tosto S; Monetti F; Airaldi S; Bignotti B; Nori J; Bagni A; Signori A; Sormani MP; Houssami N
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(16):1882-1888. PubMed ID: 26962097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agreement between digital breast tomosynthesis and pathologic tumour size for staging breast cancer, and comparison with standard mammography.
    Marinovich ML; Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Ventriglia A; Sabatino V; Houssami N
    Breast; 2019 Feb; 43():59-66. PubMed ID: 30466027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
    Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
    Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reading time for six strategies using digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts.
    Tagliafico AS; Calabrese M; Bignotti B; Signori A; Fisci E; Rossi F; Valdora F; Houssami N
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5179-5184. PubMed ID: 28643094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value of Additional Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Preoperative Staging of Breast Cancer in Dense Breasts.
    Krammer J; Stepniewski K; Kaiser CG; Brade J; Riffel P; Schoenberg SO; Wasser K
    Anticancer Res; 2017 Sep; 37(9):5255-5261. PubMed ID: 28870962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening?
    Starikov A; Drotman M; Hentel K; Katzen J; Min RJ; Arleo EK
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26549432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.