475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29724191)
1. Reliability and validity of two fitness tracker devices in the laboratory and home environment for older community-dwelling people.
Burton E; Hill KD; Lautenschlager NT; Thøgersen-Ntoumani C; Lewin G; Boyle E; Howie E
BMC Geriatr; 2018 May; 18(1):103. PubMed ID: 29724191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort.
Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 31219048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review.
Straiton N; Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gullick J; Bhindi R; Gallagher R
Maturitas; 2018 Jun; 112():85-93. PubMed ID: 29704922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.
Evenson KR; Goto MM; Furberg RD
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation Study.
Müller AM; Wang NX; Yao J; Tan CS; Low ICC; Lim N; Tan J; Tan A; Müller-Riemenschneider F
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e14120. PubMed ID: 31579026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-Cost Consumer-Based Trackers to Measure Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Among Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study.
Degroote L; Hamerlinck G; Poels K; Maher C; Crombez G; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Vandendriessche A; Curtis RG; DeSmet A
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May; 8(5):e16674. PubMed ID: 32282332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Activity trackers are not valid for step count registration when walking with crutches.
De Ridder R; De Blaiser C
Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():30-32. PubMed ID: 30798092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers.
Kooiman TJ; Dontje ML; Sprenger SR; Krijnen WP; van der Schans CP; de Groot M
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2015; 7():24. PubMed ID: 26464801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation.
Sirard JR; Masteller B; Freedson PS; Mendoza A; Hickey A
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e250. PubMed ID: 28724509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and Validity of Ten Consumer Activity Trackers Depend on Walking Speed.
Fokkema T; Kooiman TJ; Krijnen WP; VAN DER Schans CP; DE Groot M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Apr; 49(4):793-800. PubMed ID: 28319983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls.
Blondeel A; Demeyer H; Janssens W; Troosters T
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236676. PubMed ID: 32750073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Activity Trackers in Parkinson Disease: Should We Prescribe Them?
Wendel N; Macpherson CE; Webber K; Hendron K; DeAngelis T; Colon-Semenza C; Ellis T
Phys Ther; 2018 Aug; 98(8):705-714. PubMed ID: 29718452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey.
Alley S; Schoeppe S; Guertler D; Jennings C; Duncan MJ; Vandelanotte C
BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011243. PubMed ID: 27388359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities.
Alinia P; Cain C; Fallahzadeh R; Shahrokni A; Cook D; Ghasemzadeh H
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Aug; 5(8):e106. PubMed ID: 28801304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and Reliability Evaluation of Four Commercial Activity Trackers' Step Counting Performance.
Tophøj KH; Petersen MG; Sæbye C; Baad-Hansen T; Wagner S
Telemed J E Health; 2018 Sep; 24(9):669-677. PubMed ID: 29303680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers and Mobile Applications Valid for Assessing Physical Activity in High School Students? Wearfit Study.
Viciana J; Casado-Robles C; Guijarro-Romero S; Mayorga-Vega D
J Sports Sci Med; 2022 Sep; 21(3):356-375. PubMed ID: 36157395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating Motivational Interviewing and Habit Formation to Enhance the Effect of Activity Trackers on Healthy Adults' Activity Levels: Randomized Intervention.
Ellingson LD; Lansing JE; DeShaw KJ; Peyer KL; Bai Y; Perez M; Phillips LA; Welk GJ
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e10988. PubMed ID: 30762582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
