258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29724558)
1. Marginal and internal fit of pre-sintered Co-Cr and zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses as measured using microcomputed tomography.
Daou EE; Ounsi H; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Salameh Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):409-414. PubMed ID: 29724558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Compared to Cast Co-Cr.
Daou EE; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):792-799. PubMed ID: 32334442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. X-ray microtomographic evaluation of the absolute marginal fit of fixed prostheses made from soft Co-Cr and zirconia.
Daou EE
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):289-294. PubMed ID: 33279157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fit Alteration of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Multiple-Unit Prostheses After Ceramic Layering.
Daou EE; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):789-794. PubMed ID: 33486845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of repeated firings on marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different techniques.
Önöral Ö; Ulusoy M; Seker E; Etikan İ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 29627208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fit accuracy of three-unit fixed ceramic-CoCr dental prostheses fabricated by three different techniques.
Daou EE
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(5):642–649. PubMed ID: 33616570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal and internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated from translucent multicolored zirconia: Framework versus complete contour design.
Ueda K; Watanabe F; Katsuta Y; Seto M; Ueno D; Hiroyasu K; Suzuki S; Erdelt K; Güth JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):340.e1-340.e6. PubMed ID: 33198991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the choice of the measuring technique affect the comparison of fit between zirconia and cobalt-chromium prostheses?
Daou EE; Salameh P
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Apr; 24(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 38650346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
Su TS; Sun J
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
