258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29724558)
21. Effect of lamination layer thickness and abutment preparation on the fit of Co-Cr multi-unit prostheses fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vitro study.
Daou EE
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):652-657. PubMed ID: 35430049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.
Schönberger J; Erdelt KJ; Bäumer D; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2629-2635. PubMed ID: 28160108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of layer thickness on the marginal and internal adaptation of laser-sintered metal frameworks.
Kaleli N; Ural Ç; Özköylü G; Duran İ
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):922-928. PubMed ID: 30661880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia.
Bae SY; Park JY; Jeong ID; Kim HY; Kim JH; Kim WC
J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Apr; 61(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 27484816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Internal and Marginal Fit Accuracy of Pre-sintered CAD/CAM Implant-Supported Frameworks Before and After Porcelain Layering.
Rismanchian M; Davoudi A; Nosouhian S; Tabesh M; Rismanchian M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):601-607. PubMed ID: 35727255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Full-arch prostheses from translucent zirconia: accuracy of fit.
Sachs C; Groesser J; Stadelmann M; Schweiger J; Erdelt K; Beuer F
Dent Mater; 2014 Aug; 30(8):817-23. PubMed ID: 24933230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study.
Bayramoğlu E; Özkan YK; Yildiz C
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro evaluation of marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies in metal ceramic restorations produced with new technologies.
Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç Hİ; Albayrak H; Kara M
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 27130177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers.
Beuer F; Neumeier P; Naumann M
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 18976261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
