BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29724811)

  • 1. Charlie Gard: in defence of the law.
    Close E; Willmott L; White BP
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):476-480. PubMed ID: 29724811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hard lessons: learning from the Charlie Gard case.
    Wilkinson D; Savulescu J
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):438-442. PubMed ID: 28768716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guest editorial: Charlie Gard's five months in court: better dispute resolution mechanisms for medical futility disputes.
    Pope TM
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):436-437. PubMed ID: 29945990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why Charlie Gard's parents should have been the decision-makers about their son's best interests.
    Gillon R
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):462-465. PubMed ID: 29724808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who Knows Best (Interests)? The Case of Charlie Gard.
    Cave E; Nottingham E
    Med Law Rev; 2018 Aug; 26(3):500-513. PubMed ID: 29253235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Charlie Gard Case, and the Ethics of Obstructing International Transfer of Seriously Ill Children.
    Wilkinson D
    Pediatrics; 2020 Aug; 146(Suppl 1):S54-S59. PubMed ID: 32737233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie Gard case.
    Paris JJ; Cummings BM; Moreland MP; Batten JN
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):443-447. PubMed ID: 29776977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A defence of the requirement to seek consent to withhold and withdraw futile treatments.
    Stewart CL
    Med J Aust; 2012 Apr; 196(6):406-8. PubMed ID: 22471544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinic, courtroom or (specialist) committee: in the best interests of the critically Ill child?
    Huxtable R
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):471-475. PubMed ID: 29880659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Best interests" and withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from an adult who lacks capacity in the parens patriae jurisdiction.
    Willmott L; White B; Smith MK
    J Law Med; 2014 Jun; 21(4):920-41. PubMed ID: 25087370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Best interests, the power of the medical profession, and the power of the judiciary.
    Quigley M
    Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 18679803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When does life-sustaining treatment become futile?
    Griffith R
    Br J Nurs; 2013 May 23-Jun 12; 22(10):590-1. PubMed ID: 23752460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When Doctors and Parents Don't Agree: The story of Charlie Gard.
    Hammond-Browning N
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Dec; 14(4):461-468. PubMed ID: 29110172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alfie Evans and Charlie Gard-should the law change?
    Wilkinson D; Savulescu J
    BMJ; 2018 May; 361():k1891. PubMed ID: 29716900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing doctors' legal compliance across three Australian states for decisions whether to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment: does different law lead to different decisions?
    White BP; Willmott L; Cartwright C; Parker M; Williams G; Davis J
    BMC Palliat Care; 2017 Nov; 16(1):63. PubMed ID: 29179708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conceptions of dignity in the Charlie Gard, Alfie Evans and Isaiah Haastrup cases.
    Jonas M; Evans A
    Bioethics; 2020 Sep; 34(7):687-694. PubMed ID: 32562283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Best interests and pragmatism.
    McGuinness S
    Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):208-18. PubMed ID: 18679802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Best interests, public interest, and the power of the medical profession.
    Coggon J
    Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):219-32. PubMed ID: 18642085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Autonomy versus futility? Barriers to good clinical practice in end-of-life care: a Queensland case.
    Lawrence S; Willmott L; Milligan E; Winch S; White B; Parker M
    Med J Aust; 2012 Apr; 196(6):404-5. PubMed ID: 22471543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.