These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29726096)

  • 1. Design and inference for 3-stage bioequivalence testing with serial sampling data.
    Yan F; Zhu H; Liu J; Jiang L; Huang X
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):458-476. PubMed ID: 29726096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs.
    Potvin D; DiLiberti CE; Hauck WW; Parr AF; Schuirmann DJ; Smith RA
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(4):245-62. PubMed ID: 17710740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of the upper sample size limit in two-stage bioequivalence designs.
    Karalis V
    Int J Pharm; 2013 Nov; 456(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 23954235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blinded sample size re-estimation in crossover bioequivalence trials.
    Golkowski D; Friede T; Kieser M
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 24715672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing bioequivalence in serial sacrifice designs.
    Wolfsegger MJ
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Feb; 34(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17053981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical aspects of bioequivalence testing between two medicinal products.
    Zintzaras E
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2005; 30(1-2):41-6. PubMed ID: 16010860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the reference scaled bioequivalence semi-replicate method with other approaches: focus on human exposure to drugs.
    Karalis V; Symillides M; Macheras P
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Aug; 38(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 19524039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products.
    Midha KK; Rawson MJ; Hubbard JW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Oct; 43(10):485-98. PubMed ID: 16240706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size calculation for the Power Model for dose proportionality studies.
    Sethuraman VS; Leonov S; Squassante L; Mitchell TR; Hale MD
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 17323313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pilot and Repeat Trials as Development Tools Associated with Demonstration of Bioequivalence.
    Fuglsang A
    AAPS J; 2015 May; 17(3):678-83. PubMed ID: 25732246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size determination in bioequivalence studies using statistical assurance.
    Ring A; Lang B; Kazaroho C; Labes D; Schall R; Schütz H
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2019 Oct; 85(10):2369-2377. PubMed ID: 31276603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power Analysis and Sample Size Determination for Crossover Trials with Application to Bioequivalence Assessment of Topical Ophthalmic Drugs Using Serial Sampling Pharmacokinetic Data.
    Yu YP; Yan XY; Yao C; Xia JL
    Biomed Environ Sci; 2019 Aug; 32(8):614-623. PubMed ID: 31488237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-stage designs in bioequivalence trials.
    Schütz H
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 25604509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-stage designs versus European scaled average designs in bioequivalence studies for highly variable drugs: Which to choose?
    Molins E; Cobo E; Ocaña J
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4777-4788. PubMed ID: 28853164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-stage designs for cross-over bioequivalence trials.
    Kieser M; Rauch G
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(16):2403-16. PubMed ID: 25809815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation in AB/BA crossover trials with application to bioequivalence studies with incomplete and complete data designs.
    Jaki T; Pallmann P; Wolfsegger MJ
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5469-83. PubMed ID: 23801551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlling type 1 error rate for sequential, bioequivalence studies with crossover designs.
    Rasmussen HE; Ma R; Wang JJ
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 30370634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modifications of sequential designs in bioequivalence trials.
    Zheng C; Zhao L; Wang J
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 25663282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample Size Determination and Study Design Impact on Dose-Scale Pharmacodynamic Bioequivalence: a Case Study Using Orlistat.
    Xu L; Li S; Wu W; Cheng Z; Xie F
    AAPS J; 2024 Jul; 26(4):77. PubMed ID: 38960976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inflation of the type I error: investigations on regulatory recommendations for bioequivalence of highly variable drugs.
    Wonnemann M; Frömke C; Koch A
    Pharm Res; 2015 Jan; 32(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 25033764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.