458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29726402)
1. Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm.
Widesott L; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Farace P; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145016. PubMed ID: 29726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using a realistic lung phantom.
Schreuder AN; Bridges DS; Rigsby L; Blakey M; Janson M; Hedrick SG; Wilkinson JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):127-137. PubMed ID: 31763759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms.
Schreuder AN; Bridges DS; Rigsby L; Blakey M; Janson M; Hedrick SG; Wilkinson JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):160-171. PubMed ID: 31541536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical note: Evaluation and second check of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine for small-field apertures in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Holmes J; Shen J; Shan J; Patrick CL; Wong WW; Foote RL; Patel SH; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3497-3506. PubMed ID: 35305269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of dose engine algorithm in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for breast cancer.
Tommasino F; Fellin F; Lorentini S; Farace P
Phys Med; 2018 Jun; 50():7-12. PubMed ID: 29891097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of TPS calculation algorithms on dose delivered to the patient in proton therapy treatments.
Molinelli S; Russo S; Magro G; Maestri D; Mairani A; Mastella E; Mirandola A; Vai A; Vischioni B; Valvo F; Ciocca M
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(7):075016. PubMed ID: 30802887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurements of in-air spot size of pencil proton beam for various air gaps in conjunction with a range shifter on a ProteusPLUS PBS dedicated machine and comparison to the proton dose calculation algorithms.
Rana S; Samuel EJJ
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):853-862. PubMed ID: 31222565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning.
Fracchiolla F; Lorentini S; Widesott L; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8601-19. PubMed ID: 26501569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental benchmarking of RayStation proton dose calculation algorithms inside and outside the target region in heterogeneous phantom geometries.
Ruangchan S; Knäusl B; Fuchs H; Georg D; Clausen M
Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():182-193. PubMed ID: 32693355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning.
Barragán Montero AM; Souris K; Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):846-862. PubMed ID: 29159915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Commissioning of pencil beam and Monte Carlo dose engines for non-isocentric treatments in scanned proton beam therapy.
Carlino A; Böhlen T; Vatnitsky S; Grevillot L; Osorio J; Dreindl R; Palmans H; Stock M; Kragl G
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):17NT01. PubMed ID: 31342920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical examination of proton pencil beam scanning on a moving anthropomorphic lung phantom.
Wang P; Tang S; Taylor PA; Cummings DE; Janson M; Traneus E; Sturgeon JD; Lee AK; Chang C
Med Dosim; 2019 Summer; 44(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 29759487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for treatment planning.
Chamberland E; Beaulieu L; Lachance B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):4636. PubMed ID: 26103470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the ray-casting analytical algorithm for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Winterhalter C; Zepter S; Shim S; Meier G; Bolsi A; Fredh A; Hrbacek J; Oxley D; Zhang Y; Weber DC; Lomax A; Safai S
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065021. PubMed ID: 30641496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
